Tony Reale

It's that far Off?? :eek:

I haven't been reading this forum very much lately. SC has lost it's luster for me. Is anything being said about SC 2 from Hubert? SC is/was a very good "Game", but too gamey after awhile. I was looking forward to an SC 2 with more of an "historical" look and more depth.

They are two different animals. KP is regimental/battalion level. It relies heavily on supply management and keeping Divisional Integrity intact. SC is an excellent game. So is KP.

Is this compatible with 1.07?

I think that the SC engine would be better suited to an "Ancient" Strategy Game than it is to WWII. Great idea. Now we just need someone to do it!!!

Ouch! </font>

I have the AI on normal no experience for the computer. I've played both sides against the AI. Result? The computer side always gains experience quicker and loses less when you re-build. I've been playing games ( board and computer ) for close to 30 years. I'm by no means an expert player, but I've been around and I've been wrong. Regardless of how the game plays out, it is very addictive.

My screen resolution is set at 800x600, and I don't have any problems????

Give my regards to your father, tell him "thanks" for all he did.[/QB]

QUOTE]That makes two of us. My father was in the 110th Regiment, 2nd Bn., "Easy" Co. He was with the 28th from shortly after D-day, and was captured during the Bulge. Hence the nickname. My father was in the 109th Regiment,3rd BN,Anti-tank Co. He was in the 28th when it shipped to England. He was blown out of a house in the Hurtgen Forest. After getting out of the hospital and going to the Repple Depot, he finished the War with the Combat Engineers in the 3rd Army. Dad is 81 years old and still could put on his uniform and fight if he had to. Feisty old goat that he is.

Hey "BloodyBucket" , what's with the handle? I ask because my Father served in the Bloody Bucket (28 Infantry Division) during WW II.

This happens quite a lot. I think that the computer cheats. I'm not sure what happens with a human player on both sides.

If you are going to pick on us Italians, at pronounce it right. It's WOP, not waps. It stands for With Out Papers.

I award this post the "MOST RELEVANT QUESTION IN THIS THREAD" prize. Seriously.</font>

Where do you guys find the time to write all of this? Doesn't anyone work? When do you find time to even play the game? Just wondering.

The moose in scene 38 has just been sacked. NOT the Moose !!!!

I'll have to give my Dad a call. He went through St. Lo during Cobra.He mentioned that the first Germans that he encountered were dazed and surrendering. I'll see if he can elaborate on their over all combat effectiveness after the first shock wore off.

Of course, there may still be some players down in southern Florida who didn't get a chance to vote on this yet, or their votes got miscounted, or they couldn't understand what was being suggested in the first place, or whatever. :eek: [/QB]

Amen to all of the above

The problem with air units and gaining experience is that as they take losses and are built back up they lose that experience.

If you were to "simulate" WW II, all nations would compete with their "Historical" capabilities. This is "not" a simulation. It is a game. Nothing wrong with that. I enjoy it, even within it's un-historical parameters.

The thing that you have to realise is that this is in no way a simulation of WW II. It is a game. Fun to play, but very un-realistic.( Italy wiping out the Royal Navy.Italy building 15 point infantry units, American jets being destroyed by German Fighters.And the absence af American Industrial output.) It is after all a fun game to play. Take it for what it is.

I use 800 x 600 on my desktop, and have not exrerienced any problems.

I also think that air is too powerful. The Italian navy wiping out the British Navy is unbelievable. The biggest problem that I have is that the USA production is so low. Fun game if you don't take it too seriously.