Jump to content

Erwin

Members
  • Posts

    17,462
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by Erwin

  1. "Yeah, (one of) the point(s) of using the lines to select is to retain the context of what you're messing with, and automatically wooshing half way across the map back to the unit would be irritating in the extreme (especially if you happened to click the wrong line in a crowded situation)."

    Clearly, we use different techniques to play the game. I find the above issue happened rarely to me in CM1. The frustration of constantly having to go back and locate a unit in order to then go someplace else in the map to adjust its waypoint happens much more frequently in my CM2 games and is far more time-wasting and irritating.

  2. Going to level 9 is almost like having a minimap.

    Any smaller scale in a large scenario and a minimap wouldn't be that useful.

    I do wish that the "ctrl-click" metyhod of moving around a map worked better. In CM1 is was very reliable and would takeone to exactly where one wanted. In CM2, "ctrl-click" on an area of the map seems to send one off somewhere totally confusing most of the time.

  3. Michael: If the grip is the same angle as the Garand and was to be used in the same way, that's a good argument. But, I thought it was designed to be an auto support weapon - and we can see in the other MG pics that their grips are at a completely different angle. Was this gun at lot before the Stg44 (ie: an experimental predecessor)?

×
×
  • Create New...