Jump to content

Speedy

Members
  • Posts

    2,752
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Speedy

  1. Purpose is the most important decision point for what vehicles/weapons we add. Ambulance? Add that and people will expect that we do explicit casualty recovery to give the vehicle a purpose. Since we don't intend on adding that functionality, putting in an Ambulance is out of the question. Same with vehicles that are used explicitly for such purposes as rear or higher levels of C2, engineering vehicles like bulldozers and bridgelayers, etc.

    The second important decision is functionality. Do we really need to have a dozen different softskin trucks in the game when, as MikeyD pointed out, they just tend to smoke up the battlefield? Making an argument for a 3/4 WC makes a little sense in that it has a different passenger capacity than a Jeep or a Deuce and a Half, but does it really matter? And more importantly, what frontline formations used WCs? I didn't find any. These vehicles were used by rear support as far as I can see.

    The third question to ask is if it is easy. Having 4 different flavors of a PzIV model is OK since it means only minor modifications to something we already have built. Sometimes the differences are so small, or internal, that we don't have to make a new model at all. Or at least we can reuse the LODs without modification. Adding an entirely new vehicle, however, must be carefully considered.

    Lastly, is it a priority to add? Obviously it would be a bad idea to put low priority vehicles ahead of high priority vehicles, right? Now, if we really don't have any priority vehicles AND a particular vehicle makes it through all of the above, then that's a different story. Probablem is we usually have an extremely long list of priority vehicles.

    We will have a Battle Pack, containing stuff that might normally fail the above tests, but I've got to tell you... if something basically flunks the above tests it's really got no chance of getting into the game. Especially the first test.

    Steve

    Above quote from this thread.

    http://www.battlefront.com/community/showthread.php?t=95879

  2. Yes, you're right. Since posting the above I've had a chance to test this and most certainly tanks are able to select targets and fire through high bocage. I too question the reality of it. Would be interested to hear any official comment on the reasoning behind allowing this.

    Michael

    Yes Michael it is the High Bocage I am referring to.

    The problem is exacerbated by bocages propensity to stop high velocity AP rounds dead.

  3. I have noticed in the game that you can easily roll a combat vehicle into an excellent fighting position just behind bocage. To me this just doesn't seem realistic as although the vehicles gun might penetrate the bocage and have a clear LOF I would think that unless time was spent cutting a hole in the bocage the vehicles optics would not be able to see anything.

    Anyone have any thoughts on this?

  4. Ok so I bought ROF and started a career in a DR1 on the first mission I get slightly wounded early but manage to shoot down an SE5 (yay me) on the way home my engine decides to stop and wont restart. A message pops up on the screen saying my aircraft is destroyed. What?? No it isn't it's gliding along quite nicely it's just the engine having a rest.

    Well I make a perfect forced landing in a field, no damage to the aircraft and am quietly congratulating myself while going to the results screen where I am informed that my aircraft has crashed ? What? No it didn't, please fix or do somefink.

  5. Given the current state of the engine (pretty solid) a 2011 release of the next module should be guaranteed.

    Best regards,

    Thomm

    Honestly a guaranteed 2011 release is extremely optimistic. Past history has a release every 12 months or so, given they have an additional programmer I would suggest a realistic release of maybe 9 months from CMBN release so Feb-Mar 2012 for the Commonwealth module.

  6. The vagaries of postal services are notorious. For me my pre-order arrived here in rural Australia a little over a week after shipping however I have had other not so good experiences.

    For one earlier this year I ordered some books from amazon, a month after the expected delivery date and they still hadn't arrived so I contacted amazon and had another package sent out to me (this ended up saving me money as they refunded my initial credit card charge and then recharged for the new shipment and in the intervening 6 weeks the exchange rate had improved quite a bit :D).

    Anyway a couple of weeks later the new package arrived, then about a week after that I recieved a letter from a complete stranger who lived 600 km away who had recieved the original package intended for me. Somehow Australia post had put an address label for them on my package and it was delivered months late to him even though it still had the original amazon address to me on it.

    Moral of the story it's only been a couple of weeks give it one or two more weeks and if it still hasn't turned up contact battlefront sales and see what they can do.

×
×
  • Create New...