Jump to content

Fenris

Members
  • Posts

    1,114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Fenris

  1. Quote

    Per VOA, the Scranton Army Ammunition Plant is now producing more than 36,000 155mm shells per month. 

    Before 2022, the plant produced roughly 7,000 shells per month; the Army aimed to hit 35,000 shells per month by 2027. SCAAP beat that goal by over two years.

    And

    Quote

     

    2S7 Pion 203mm self propelled cannon in Ukrainian service, seen here firing somewhere on the southern front.  

    There’s been a fair amount of new Ukrainian 2S7 content released over the past week, after a 6+ month long drought.

    Quite possible that Ukraine has received a new supply of 8 inch shells.

    Seen here, 2S7 footage from the 43rd Artillery Brigade.

     

     

  2. Footage from infantryman with 3rd Assault near Avdiivka.  English subs work. They end up having to pull out after being hit by mortar fire, sounds painful but hopefully not too bad, they manage to get out on their feet.  Interesting ~6:30 mark to see co-ordination of command, recon and FPV operator to attack the mortar position.

     

  3. 55 minutes ago, dan/california said:

    In particular the gun can respond to close targets far faster than anything else. Say you are in the process of stopping and boarding a freighter of unknown provenance/registration/intentions, having a fast firing five inch gun pointed directly at the bridge of said freighter is a extremely good guarantee of the ships behavior unless the people on the bridge are suicidal. Furthermore the boom the five inch makes is unlikely to damage your own ship if it detonates a kilometer or two away.

    FWIW - I seem to recall reading the AU frigates that went over during Desert Storm (can't remember which) were considered quite useful because they had a deck gun able to do fire missions for troops on the ground.  A ship though has a whole tool kit of weapons so I think it's quite obviously a useful capability in that context.

    On land, I tend to agree with @Kinophile, on the proviso that there's ammunition this conflict has shown mobile artillery is in the ascendancy (edit compared MBTs).  I wouldn't be surprised to eventually see the traditional direct fire MBT's becoming short to medium range precision, indirect platforms with armour and jamming to help them survive being closer to the front.  More traditional tube artillery will become wheeled because it's affordable and mobility seems to be better for survival than armour at this stage.

  4. Some good vision here of Challenger 2 on the training range.  Includes an example of one of the things that the reporter says is an issue fielding this vehicle in Ukraine when it gets bogged in a ditch.  He comments at the end re mobility and maintenance being the main problems they've been facing.

     

  5. Quote

    Footage of a desperate attempt of the crew of "Sergey Kotov" patrol boat to avoid demilitarisation by Ukrainian unmanned surface drones in the Black Sea. The ship sank as a result of the strikes.

    This clip is from a civilian ship that was nearby.  They spot one of the drones trailing the patrol boat before the clip ends.

    Another clip, this time it shows what I'm guessing is the first impact

    Apologies if this has been posted up thread.

    Seeing the tail chase etc makes me wonder whether the ye olde smoke dischargers would help.  If the crew has been alerted, at least to make more difficult for the drone pilot to see what/where he's hitting, or don't modern boats have smoke anymore?  Have wondered the same with AFV's, the T series can dump smoke can't it?  Dump smoke and hide inside, at least make it more difficult for an FPV to hit the rear turret.

     

     

  6. I like to think that the CO of a NATO/Western unit wouldn't have put his men in that situation in the first place.  Still, with so many variables, things go sideways all the time.  The UKR SOF raid the other day that was wiped out on the beach is another example.  Training and experience can mitigate some of the risk but there is still some risk and sometimes fate is cruel.

  7. Opinion piece from Mick Ryan.  Site is paywalled but I think you get the first few page views free.  Doesn't really say anything new for people like us, it's in one of the most read news papers here so is more for the average Joe rather than for war nerd Joe's on the CM forums.

    Quote

     

    Two years on, Ukraine’s moral courage shames fickle West

    The Ukrainian people have seen off these threats. They have demonstrated the resilience, creativity, courage and sacrifice inherent in a mature, sovereign polity. But, most crucially, the people of Ukraine have demonstrated will. It is the kind of will that many Western nations, with their short attention spans and avoidance of personal and political risk, appear to have in short supply.

     

    https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/two-years-on-ukraine-s-moral-courage-shames-fickle-west-20240221-p5f6rb.html

     

     

  8. Drone footage of two HIMARS strikes against groups of infantry.  Can clearly see the splash of the ball bearings on the second one.  It's not gory but is graphic how the effects are clearly visible.

    Local defence in Kreminna forest.  Interesting as shows night time use of de-mining charges at the start.  Although unclear how it relates to the following day time footage, am guessing the RU infantry were trying infiltration.

    So can UKR have ATACMS now?  Have seen this posted elsewhere as well with claims of various types on Iranian missiles involved.

     

  9. So, anyway.... RU still on the attack.  Footage of successful local defence west of Avdiivka.

    And the same near Vuhledar 

     

    UKR  unable to strike RU as they form up

    Looks like UKR still have some arty ammo available around Robotyne though

     

    And Krynky has fallen!  Apparently.

    More on why the above is doing the rounds

     

×
×
  • Create New...