Jump to content

dima

Members
  • Posts

    939
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dima

  1. Originally posted by George Mc:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by dima:

    Are trees destructible?

    From what I've seen if they take hits they lose leaves etc. I've not deliberately targeted a tree to see if I can KO it. Must admit there are other targets more deserving of my ammo smile.gif

    Only two days to go and you can shoot up as many trees as you like - or BMPs, T-72s, Abrams, Strykers et al smile.gif

    Cheers fur noo

    George </font>

  2. Originally posted by Steiner14:

    IMO the priorities of the reviewer are very strange and seem to fit more into the playstation-category.

    Very True.

    And then here comes the question - why does Battlefront give preview copies to every Joe Sixpack reviewer out there? Why not do some filtering to make sure reviewers understand the concept of the gender and are thorough with their review. IMHO 5 credible reviews published in the press are a lot better than 50 reviews done by anyone and their grandma - because it only takes a few bad apples to spoil the whole thing.

    You don't see Mazda Protege being reviewed in "Best Retirement Homes Magazine" and you don't see Lincoln Towncar reviewed in "Today's Ricer Magazine".

    [ July 20, 2007, 04:36 PM: Message edited by: dima ]

  3. This kind of **** happens with many games. Publishers ship games to retail stores in advance so that on release date they can ALL start selling. Once store gets a copy they are not suppose to sell it until release date, but what's physically stopping them. Maybe a high-school kid employee who gets paid minimum wage just didn't know or care and put all the stuff delivered by FedEx early morning right on the shelf.

  4. Originally posted by Darkmath:

    ...the problem with T72 would not be its weaponry, as deadly as 120mm but less accurate

    Actually based on my quick glance through russian sources and discussions about T-72 penetrating Abrams from the front - it can't. So then even if it had the first shot and hit that doesn't mean a kill.

    Can CMSF testers share, in game does T-72 gun penetrate Abrams front hull or turret?

  5. Originally posted by C'Rogers:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />I remember reading somewhere Steve or Martin (or someone else from BTS) mentioned that overwhelming majority of customers interested in single player games only.

    Is that still true?

    That is a generally true fact of pretty much any game to my knowledge. Like I can't imagine playing the Battlefield series against the AI but I know people who only play that way (or at most on a LAN with people they know but not strangers on the Internet). It is still I think common for all games, however those people are obviously less likely to post in internet forums. So if you always play online and visit forums they don't seem to exist. </font>
  6. Originally posted by rune:

    Not our magic to fix it..it is nvidias. The problem with trying to code around it, is that nvidia make fix the problem and then the game is broke again. Remember, I have the 7800 card, not an 8800 card, but I even have issues with Vista 64, an identical commputer running Vista 32 does NOT have the problem. [shrug]

    Rune

    Rune, overall which card (ATI or nVidia) has less issues with CMSF?
  7. Not sure if the subject was discussed before (search didn't return any usefull info). I am wondering how IED usage will be simulated. Unlike mines these devices can be externally triggered. I can imagine in the game one may want to trigger IED placed beside the road when:

    a) The first vehicle passes

    B) An armoded vehicle passes

    c) A specific vehicle passes

    Is it possible to have such arrangements for human player? What about AI - can some of these options be specified in the mission builder?

  8. Thanks for clarifying this Steve! I just saw that you were taking this guy's trolls seriously and perhaps missed the bigger picture or took things out of context.

    As far as info on modern russian equipment - yes it is certanly a lot less publicised. Yet on russian discussion boards there is cernanly more information available and there is fair share of criticism by folks who are educated and experienced in these subjects. At times people are biased towards taking more sceptical look just because not much information is available - they don't think that such and such capability is well-working and kept secret, they rather assume that it is in a shamefull state and this is why it is kept secret.

    lockon.ru and sukhoi.ru forums are good examples of such places. Unfortunately both are in Russian only.

    [ June 29, 2007, 10:26 PM: Message edited by: dima ]

  9. Originally posted by Moon:

    - deluxe version (download & mail) with all of the above plus the mousepad plus a poster with the Syrian campaign map for $60 plus shipping. Again, you save $10 over what this option will cost later. The deluxe option is not available as download only (duh...)

    Martin

    Martin, (or someone else from BTS) can you elaborate on the Syria map? My question is from the game's point of view - how practically usefull the map will be? For Falcon 4 map of Korea was obviously usefull. For Lockon map of Caucasus and Crimea (if one was sold) would obviously be nice too. But for ground tactical simulation?

    This is beside the point that such a map would have really nice aesthetic value to have on the wall.

  10. Originally posted by Darius359au:

    How does a disscusion about syria buying migs turn into another unsobil jew hating thread?

    All that needs to be done - is for moderator to delete his and other unrelated messages and we will continue talking. At least this is how we handle this stuff over at lockon.ru forums.

    Locking this topic will accomplish exactly what this guy was aiming for - derail and disrupt the rest of forum members'c discussions

  11. I don't think this analogy (while funny to visualize) is accurate for this situation. It would be more like the same person crashing a meeting and doing the same. Is everyone else just going to sit there and let him rant?
    OK, imagine, you are in a meeting with your buddies discussing different nation's weapons capabilities and suddenly a kid in huge jeans, pearced nose, ears, lips comes in and starts saying this stuff. In a familiar manner like today's teenagers talk. Are you going to interrupt your fairly serious discussions and start to argue with him on his level? Or will you call his mom and ask politely to have him taken away? Trouble on this forum is - you have no way to call his mom smile.gif
  12. Originally posted by Normal Dude:

    I completely agree, and that's why I think the trolls, when they post crazy stuff, need to be answered. Otherwise what's stopping some impressionable kid from getting his head stuffed with BS?

    Granted, a few of my commments haven't been completely constructive ( ;) ), but I don;t think trolls will just go away if they aren't fed. I think they will just continue to post and post until it gets out of hand.

    OK, imagine you are walking in downtown New York and some homeless person in ripped clothing and no teeth starts to shout some weird stuff - like "aliens are here", or "Men In Black are going to kill us". Whould you get into argument with him, trying to discuss his views and give him your opinion? I think not. The same thing is going on here.
  13. You know guys, the advantage of the internet is that any human being can go and write anything about anything. And he can claim to be anybody too.

    This is also its problem. People who read that stuff and are not critical can take the written info for granted. Just like I am sure will happen with this dude unsobill. The guy is either

    a) 10-year-old russian

    B) 50-year-old russian old fart

    c) 10-year-old american having fun

    d) maybe even Rune or MadMatt having fun after hard work day.

    But what it will create in many members on the forum is they will think he is real and is really serious representation of russian population. And in the end it hurts you guys, not the russians.

    The only reason he has continued to troll here is that poeple (and to my huge surprise Steve himself) has taken his troll bate. That's why I asked, and ask again - Steve, is it really you ?

  14. Originally posted by Battlefront.com:

    [QB] Dima,

    The survey is what it is. The Russian people were asked what they thought about a large number of things and they answered the questions "what do you think about American technology" and "what do you think about President Putin". Overwhelmingly the Russians responded:

    1. US technology isn't impressive

    2. Putin is awesome

    The rest of the world answered the same two questions in the exact opposite way. They said:

    1. US technology is very impressive

    2. Putin is bad

    What does it mean Putin is "bad or good". That's like asking poor if it is good to raise taxes. And like asking rich if it is good to raise taxes. What answers do you expect from different group? In the case of Bush and Putin - bad is really misleading term. Putin is bringing russia back (slowly and who knows how far) to the old days where it has more power and influence. That is good for russians and bad for the rest. So what reaction will you expect?

    See Unsobill's comments on the previous page. I took it to be that he is Russian. If he isn't, then I stand corrected.

    So you are taking the opinion of some guy (probably in his teen years) who may or may not be russian to reflect opinion of the rest of russians? And you mention some survery? We have a joke in russia. "According to recent survey it appears that 100% or russian population has access to Internet. The survey was conducted on the main web page of Izvestia news agency.

    You got that backwards. I said the entire world has a negative view of Bush and Putin, but Russia think's Putin "is da bomb, baby!" :D

    Again, this is like my neighbour thinks I am bad because I have more money and drive nicer car. And my wife thinks I am good because of that.

    But you can't mix with the same reasoning the capabilities of weapon system to destroy intended target. Because unlike Bush and Putin opinion this capability can be objectively measured and determined.

    The reason I am writing all this (as you know I rarely post here at all) is that it doen't really matter what the average Joe thinks about Bush or Putin. In Russia, in USA, in Nigeria. But to be honest it matters to me what you guys think about Russia and its weapon systems and more importantly, where you get your information from. Because you are the guys that are making CMSF and that will reflect russian technology. And I want you to try to reflect those capabilities as close to the reality as possible. Not cripple it, not make it look good. And although I fully understand that you guys may generally dislike Russia I really don't want this to influence the game to skew the balance.

    As you probably remember, I am a beta tester for LockOn: Black Shark. The devs are russians, many of whom have just as much dislike of USA. Yet they never try to enhance Ka-50 capabilities or cripple USA capabilities. Because above all is the correct simulation. Granted we (russians) probably have more info about USA weapon capabilities than you guys about russian capabilities (and (!) deficincies) for one simple reason - language barries. Well, plus the fact that historically Russian capabilities are kept secret a lot more than USA.

    So it is important to me what kind of info you have about russian weapons and where your sources are from. And I sincerely hope that they are more serious than guys like usobill or some bogus survey.

  15. So either Russia is right and the rest of the world is wrong about technology and Putin, or Russia might want to take a harder look at its belief system.

    Steve [/QB]

    Err... Steve is this really you? smile.gif

    How can you mix the two things anyway? That's like saying - my Ford salesman says that Ford cars are a lot more reliable than Japanese cars. Also he says that he belives Earth is round and it rotates around the Sun. But because of his first statement about cars I won't even belive his second statement.

    Also, where did you get the idea that Russia thinks US weapons are crap?

    And where did you also get the idea that Putin is NOT having the support of vast majority of population? Hopefully not by correlation of the two facts? Or from Fox News?

    Or did I misunderstand your whole point?

  16. Originally posted by Moon:

    Nox, yes, soldiers yell and fall to earth.

    Buddy aid: when members of a squad get incapacitated, another squad member in the vicinity is going to get up, run over to the wounded guy, and treat him automatically.

    Martin

    Martin, what about insurgent side? Do they also drop what they are doing and go help wounded?
  17. Originally posted by Battlefront.com:

    Waypoints are possible, but only at the expense of the 16 slots for each Group's part of the Plan. In other words, you can have a total of 16 things for a Group to do, which can me 16 Waypoints. You don't want to micromanage them much beyond that anyway or the Plan will be too brittle.

    Steve

    Steve, any reason for limit of 16? Technical? Or something else?
  18. Originally posted by Battlefront.com:

    I wanted to wait until it was actually coded and working before telling you. I hate making empty promises, I love making statements of actual fact :D

    Steve

    That and you probably didn't want to reveal detailed specs for the competition to find out.

    If I were you I'd keep it secred right up to game release smile.gif

×
×
  • Create New...