phil stanbridge Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 I've spent some time trying out the Canadians and really like what i see. They feel more mobile than the other forces (don't ask me why!) and their light infantry dudes really pack a punch. Plus those armoured cars they use are amazing. Talk about taking punishment! I've only tried a couple of missions to date however. Anyway reason I'm here to pester is this - I've a couple of questions. First of all, recce infantry units don't appear to have binoculars - this can't be right surely. Secondly, concerning the LAV III, when they have passengers they like to stick their top halves out of the back - and I can't button the chaps up again. So they're sitting ducks. What gives? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erwin Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 The fact that the Canucks can't afford the extra set of binocs was discussed elsewhere. (I think it's an error.) While we're at it, I noticed (in the Campaign) that once any recon inf unit dismounts from its recon vehicle, it cannot mount any other recon vehicle. Is this a bug? (Am in middle of battle so I haven't check to see if any other inf unit can mount a recon vehicle to get the ammo.) The other question is whether their personal ATGM (Gustav??) is any good vs buildings etc? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akd Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 The other question is whether their personal ATGM (Gustav??) is any good vs buildings etc? The Carl Gustaf is a recoilless rifle, and its HE ammo is good vs. buildings. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan Wotherspoon Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 Just noticed something strange, the deploy weapon command is missing for the Canadian C6 HMG. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chainsaw Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 The Carl Gustaf is a recoilless rifle, and its HE ammo is good vs. buildings. Because its Swedish! what I dont get is why they only use HE rounds? we use HE, SMOKE, Anti-Tank and Illuminating rounds to our 84mm. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erwin Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 Well, my Canadians shot two Gustav rounds at a small building with enemy inf and I was "underwhelmed" at the result. The other AT missile the inf carries (like the LAW) is supposed to be effective vs buildings as well, but when I use TARGET for max fire, the inf wouldn't fire em. Any ideas? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.