janbo Posted June 22, 2006 Share Posted June 22, 2006 Exactly. Making some countrys units better than others, just because they did some ass-kicking historically, is just stupid. If one was to change the combat values of U.S. paratroopers, which undoubtly were good, one would have to change a lot of other unit values too. For example you may look at the statistics between Soviet and Finnish troops in their mutual conflict and you'll see they're heavily tipped to the latters favour. Yet, they're equal in the game, which is fine. (Though the defense value of finnish troops is 1 higher, i think.) There's countless of other examples, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Posted June 22, 2006 Share Posted June 22, 2006 Originally posted by jon_j_rambo: U.S. Paratroops were in a class by themselves. the class of 39? they must have been special though, 'cos no-one ever asked them to drop into really hot zones like Crete or Arnhem. I thought the US was a classless society?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisND Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 Hey, just because Rambo is a jack-ass doesnt mean you have to insult us. Why the hell are you taking him seriously anyways? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 I've got a game agaisnt him? Who did I insult?!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisND Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 Nevermind , I miss-read your post, my apologies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts