Jack Carr Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 The gun looks more like a 37mm or 57mm but is supposed to be a 75mm??? Just my guess. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Other Means Posted January 17, 2005 Author Share Posted January 17, 2005 I refer people to this earlier post: Originally posted by Other Means: Why has a British Staghound got a star on it? Or have I just exposed myself to (more) ridicule? And to John D Salts scholarly answer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Other Means Posted January 17, 2005 Author Share Posted January 17, 2005 Originally posted by oneirogen: The topic made me think Other Means stumbled upon that series of pictures that's been making rounds on the internet of a man cutting his member in half and nailing his scrotum into a table. Was wondering a bit about the forum though. There was a lot of things wrong in those pictures. Anyways, carry on chaps. Stumbled...umm - yeah. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zebulon Pleasure Beast Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 Originally posted by Other Means: Stumbled...umm - yeah. I put "Lindsay Lohan lesbian porn" into Google but it somehow turned out as "zany man cuts off his willy." I reckon me keyboard batteries be running low. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Other Means Posted January 17, 2005 Author Share Posted January 17, 2005 Originally posted by oneirogen: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Other Means: Stumbled...umm - yeah. I put "Lindsay Lohan lesbian porn" into Google but it somehow turned out as "zany man cuts off his willy." I reckon me keyboard batteries be running low. </font> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 You guys are SOOO wrong!! the real thing wrong with that picture is that it's past T1 and OM's vehicle isn't a blazing wreck!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Other Means Posted January 17, 2005 Author Share Posted January 17, 2005 Originally posted by Mike: You guys are SOOO wrong!! the real thing wrong with that picture is that it's past T1 and OM's vehicle isn't a blazing wreck!! Oh, have we played? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibsonm Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 That you have the command element forward (since the command lines face rearwards) instead of one of the subordinate call signs. Or have the others run away .... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 Originally posted by gibsonm: Or have the others run away .... They probably saw what was coming. Michael 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 Originally posted by Other Means: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Mike: the real thing wrong with that picture is that it's past T1 and OM's vehicle isn't a blazing wreck!! Oh, have we played? </font> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacobs_ladder2 Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 Originally posted by Boo Radley: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Michael Dorosh: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Philippe: Didn't one of the Commonwealth armies in Overlord sometimes reverse the star so that it was point down, to distinguish it from the Americans ? You rang? We (Canadians) put them on crooked - not necessarily point down. Just crooked, so we didn't look like 'Mericans. </font> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.