Tacitus Posted April 28, 2004 Share Posted April 28, 2004 Think of all the great tanks without too longer ranges. Also N.German terrain would limit things,but not so desert.Anyway got the terrain now! How about:- M48,M60, Comet,Centurion,Cheiftain, Leopard I T54/55,T62/64. BMP-1,ZSU234/4 etc etc. Also 1st generation AT missiles and Helicopters.Last can be abstracted in a way similar to aircraft in CM now. Just hoping..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Posted April 28, 2004 Share Posted April 28, 2004 "Korea-Arab-Israeli Wars 1946-1967" Which war did the Koreans and the Arabs fight in 1946? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted April 28, 2004 Share Posted April 28, 2004 Originally posted by Sergei: Which war did the Koreans and the Arabs fight in 1946? You mean you never heard of the great ongoing Arab-Korean Cheese War? What do they teach in Finnish schools? Tsk, tsk. Michael 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gyrene Posted April 28, 2004 Share Posted April 28, 2004 Why not Korea-Arab-Israeli Wars 1946-1967Maybe because only Frunze would want to play the Arabs? He'd be booked solid for PBEM for months! Gyrene 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gibsonm Posted April 28, 2004 Share Posted April 28, 2004 Originally posted by Tacitus: Leopard IWho fielded these in Korea or the Middle East ???? Or is this an attempt at a back door version of NATO Vs Warsaw Pact in the 60’s 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted April 28, 2004 Share Posted April 28, 2004 Originally posted by gibsonm: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Tacitus: Leopard IWho fielded these in Korea or the Middle East ???? Or is this an attempt at a back door version of NATO Vs Warsaw Pact in the 60’s </font> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacitus Posted April 28, 2004 Author Share Posted April 28, 2004 Perhaps "Arab wars" are a bit of a sore point for you at the moment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted April 28, 2004 Share Posted April 28, 2004 Arab-Israeli wargames would be very interesting to play but I shudder at the possible partisan board complaints over wording in the scenario orders section. Knock-down fights over the use of the term "invasion" vs "liberation" vs "occupation" for instance. For some even the most neutral phrasing would be a red flag. To use another example, imagine the trouble you could get into producing an India-Pakistan series with Kashmere in the middle! [ April 28, 2004, 05:02 PM: Message edited by: MikeyD ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.