Alexey K

So far I don't quite get one thing. How information exchange between units affect spotting and reaction times. For example, enemy tank is spotted by scout sqad and my own tank is hiding behind something. How exactly my tank is taking into account data about spotted enemy tank? Or the only way to exploit that knowledge is to manually set targeting arc for my tank?

So, "giant humanoid robots" are not far away?

I've got different experience in CMBS. Yesterday in one QB one of my AGS was shooting at HMMWV (Mk.19 turret). It has put three long 10+ shot bursts into it with multiple grenades hitting turret ("Weapon mount"). Gunner wasn't even injured.

So, one can assume that strikes to the rear hull should take out engine with high degree of probability, shouldn't they?

I didn't tracked what kinds of RPG actually hit that tank. But it was really beaten up. What is level of protection of Abrams in side and rear projections?

Yeah, but it can withstand multiple hits in it's butt, tough b*stard In recent QB i had several Abrams tanks coming to town with my infantry in houses, mines, etc. One tank was hit by mine, immobilized and then poured with RPG fire from multiple directions. I managed to survive 10-12 hits to side and rear parts of hull and turret. My official position is that it is... unfair!

Actually, blitz-googling (yandexing, in fact ) failled to give any clear accounts on presence or absence of RPG-29 in troops as standard or special weapon. Need some more digging into search engine. P.S. What "SOL" stands for?

Somehow RPG-29 have made it's way to theese guys Looks like those crates has actullay label "For use in war against America" written on them, but that text is written in Arabic langauge

It was adopted by Soviet Army and inherited by Russian Ground Forces. Since in game Russians are against USA with their armour it would be reasonable to equip infantry with some RPG-29s in addition to standard issue RPG-7.

Thanks!

Did I miss RPG-29 or it isn't included in game?

Yeah, so far seems like a bad luck

Hm... Never knew it was an option. How can I control deployment mode?

I've just had thee AT-7 teams firing at two BRDMs at ~400m. Veterans. They've wasted EIGHT missiles before scoring first hit. Targets were static and didn't fire back. What's the catch? Too close?

Gloomy teutonic genius. CMBS definitely lacks German troops!

Secret footage from Russian Army training grounds: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaXo7kaLpuw

I've just tested it. Still it has significant deviation when tank turns it's hull. Nowhere near that smooth as on video ^)

Playing CMBS I've noticed that when tank turns main turrent always stays fixed relative to it's hull, thus losing LOS to target. This looks weird as there is any number of videos with tanks maneuring and their guns staying sticked on target regardless of hull movement. Something like this: https://youtu.be/jh4F3J9-9sA?t=21 But in game tanks seem to lack automatic horizontal stabilization at all. P.S. Since I've played only Russian side, I've oberved this behaviour for T-72 and T-90 series. I have no idea how it works for Abrams.

Russain BTG with Tanks. Standard Air controller and Forward Observer teams were present, but it weren't able to call air support.

Ugm... no save at hand Since I'am member of "No Savegames" religion, I rarely have one

Played QB for Russians. Buyed Havoc support, but failed to call it in. Says "Denied". Tried to call by HQ units, Air Controllers and Forward observers with zero success. What am I doing wrong? P.S. In previous games i've successfully called in Hinds and Frogfoots.

Yes, porting it to Armata chassis is a plan.

It is t-90 based chassis.

Why rear part of side skirts are slat armour, not ERA blocks? I've seen it on many tanks.

So, problem is that all projectiles are intercepted or that hits do not kill tank?