Jump to content

Alexey K

Members
  • Posts

    296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Alexey K

  1. About Ukranian (and sometimes Russian meida). There is a one guy in youtube - Anatoly Shariy. He is regularly exposes fakes in media. He mostly is focused on Ukraninan sources but occasionaly slams Russian news as well :) 

     

    Overll conslusion from his videos is that current news from these sources generally should be dismissed as intentional fakes or instances of incompetent journalism. 

  2. I'very found some official info. Ukraniand admitted 22 KIA, 150 injured "during last three days"

    Googled for that tweet, found none. But there are numerous Ukranian sites copying same scary story about Russian special force fighting rebels for trucks to move bodies away :)

    Looks like this text is basis of that "tweet" was mentioned.

  3. I read a good three weeks ago that Ukrainian troops in Debaltseve already had contingency plans in place for an orderly withdrawal if desired. Who goes in what order, under what protective fire, by what routes.

     

    A Russian mercenary commander at Debaltseve tweeted that Russian bodies were strewn unburied  across the battlefield. All to take possession of a blasted hole that used to be a railway yard. The definition of a Pyrrhic victory.

     

    I would be very strange for "Russian mercenary commander" to tweet things like that. 

    Can you provide link to that tweet?

  4. I've noticed some strange thing with smoke launchers on T-72B3. 

    AFAIK smoke mortars are located on turret and should be launched along main gun axis.

    But when I order smoke to my tank, it appears along hull axis. 

     

    Is this a bug?

     

    EDIT:

    And one more quiestion: are smoke launchers reloadable?

    I've seen one Bradley for launch smoke 3 or 4 times.

  5. European MSM is quoting Ukrainian forces saying they had to retreat though fields - as the road network was cut or under sustained artillery fire - in groups of under fifty and under small arms fire. From reading these sources it looks like whatever was in Debaltsevo only came out in fragmented pieces minus their wounded and heavy equipment.

     

    That mode of retreat implies loss of all heavy equipment, doesn't it?

  6.  

    It's hard to tell, has Putin won or not without knowing his intent.

    There are widly different speculations on this matter. Versions range from that all war in Eastern Ukraine is just cover operation for tacking Crimea back, to that he wants to annex entire Ukraine and rebuild Soveit Empire (of Evil).

  7. I've seen multiple messages that from Debaltsevo Ukraninan Army pulled out ~2450 men and 200 vehicles including 15 tanks and 50 BMPs.

     

    Any sources on total amount of forces Ukranian Army had in Debaltsevo?

     

    Has only unofficial source in LJ saying that inside Debaltsevo there was 5 BTGs and 4 more were sent to rescue.

  8. I am only confident in long term trends. The war in Ukraine is unsustainable from Russia's perspective. This is more akin to First Chechen War or Afghanistan than it is any other conflict Russia has fought or proxy fought since the fall of the Soviet Union. Ukraine is in tough shape too, but Ukraine isn't the one that is trying to be a world power.

    Everything in life is relative. If you keep that in mind when assessing something, you'll do a lot better than if you stick with absolutes. Nations can win battles and lose wars. Even the most powerful ones.

    Steve

     

    Actually, I don't see why Russia needs this, I mean intense combat. From Russian perspective it would be better if sides adhered Minsk[-2] agreements and simply kept conflict frozen for a while. The only reasonable explnation is that Russia is not controlling rebels that tightly to enforce strict adherence.

     

    IMO, Putin is now between two fires: further escalation of this war is pointless for Russia, but he can't simply abandon rebels, as he would face drop in popular support whithin Russia.

  9. Could you please identify countries and populations that support Russia's actions in the Ukraine?  They may oppose it less than the US, but about as positive as you'll get is "Russia is wrong to do this, but we don't strongly care because it's not our backyard" 

    I don't say they support it. They mostly don't care or seek to use this situation on their own behalf, like South American countries that increased their food export to Russia or China that has signed long prepared gas deal. 

  10. Which is equally offensive to the rest of the world at large.  Same effect different goal.  Objection to Russian intervention is the objection to Russian intervention, not exactly supporting the Ukraine (although because of the way Russia has followed through it's turned into effectively supporting the Ukraine).  

     

    I don't think it really offensive to "rest of the world" :)

    It is offensive mostly to US and US imposes it's will on it's European allies.

  11. And Russians hade a legit grievance against the west in 1940 as a result of German actions. 

     

    And yet that experience continues to define Russian policy making.  History has a way of lingering, especially traumatic history.   

     

    Ukraine isn't a great country by any stretch of the imagination, but if the US carved off part of Mexico because it was full of US retirees (they long to be Americans again, and Mexico is a failed state!) the UK returned various commonwealth countries to colony status (they're the queens subjects and they long to return to her welcoming arms and are suffering under the present government!) the lid flipping would be just as severe.  Objection to Russian actions shouldn't be seen as tacit approval of the Ukraine, but objection to sneakily taking parts of other countries.  If the Eastern Ukraine really wanted to return to Russia there were other ways to do it that didn't involve "separatists," Russian special forces on leave, and T-72s and BUKs sprouting up from the soil.

     

    I doubt that Putin or anybody in power in Russia really want to chop off Eastern Ukraine and annex it. 

    I think that low-intensity or frozen conflict inside Ukraine if more preferrable option.

  12. The eastern rump of Ukraine, composed heavily of ethnic Russians, longs to re-integrate with the mother country. And not just for nationalist reasons. Economic interests play an important role. Ukraine has been in arrears with Russia's natural gas deliveries.

    It's not only gas. Eastern Ukraine has majority of industry and good share of it's products was exported to Russia. Space rockets (Zenit) and some space tech, helicopter engines, railroad locomotives, etc. These economic ties were formed during Soviet period and helped them to keep afloat after fall up USSR. Now these ties are cut off for political reasons and no new markets to replace them have emerged.

  13. It seems to me that over the last 70 years or so whenever there has been civil conflict within a country super power involvement has only made it worse, bigger and bloodier but with probably the same outcome. There may be exceptions, but it appears to me that that serves as a general rule of thumb.

     

    Michael

     

    Can't say anything about outcomes, but completely agree that external involvement tends to make civil wars bloodier.

×
×
  • Create New...