Jump to content

HUSKER2142

Members
  • Posts

    367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by HUSKER2142

  1. I have a question for developers. How does AI logic work when and what kind of projectile should be charged. My ZIS-2 anti-tank gun refuses to shoot sub-caliber projectiles when it's needed. The purpose of the tank "TIGR" located front armor at a distance of 890 meters. Do not you think you can make it possible for players to choose which shells to shoot forcibly?

  2. 6 hours ago, LUCASWILLEN05 said:

    Even if Belarus attempts to stay neutral does not guarantee they would not be invaded. Once a war has started with NATO Putin might weld decide to attack Belarus States. While an escalation this would still keep the war relatively limited to the territories of the former Soviet Union.

    Regarding Kaliningrad it may well be that Russia would invade the Baltic Sates in order to link up with the Oblast. However, if Article 5 is not in play at this point it would be pretty quickly following a Russian move of that sort. Militarily NATO might not be able to prevent the conquest of the Baltic States but, politically it could be a mistake for Putin Russia however would have to move swiftly to achieve all military objectives before NATO is fully mobilized and deployed to Eastern Europe

    Belarus is too valuable an ally for Russia, in this country there has never been a regime that threatens Russia's security.

    As I described above that the invasion of the Baltic countries by Russia, will cause the NATO invasion of Kaliningrad to search for and destroy the INF systems in Kaliningrad. To invade the Baltic states simply because of political ambitions the Kremlin is not a fool.

  3. 9 hours ago, LUCASWILLEN05 said:

    Expanded war options would be interesting. Belorussia might also be invaded 

    hAttp://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Will-Belarus-Be-The-Next-Ukraine-For-Russia.html

    And I believe they do use the T-80...

    Belarus will try its best to be in neutrality, to give the maximum to the territory if the group of Russian troops is defeated in Kaliningrad, to allow the troops to retreat. Provision of secretly conducting radio technical reconnaissance. I do not think that Belarus will enter into a conflict unless it is threatened or the war moves to the territory of the Russian Federation.

     

     

    Russian CampaignSPOILERS 

     

    As a result, the Russian campaign came out of 4 missions. In the 4th last mission it was hard, mainly because of counter attacks by tank platoons and attacks by the enemy's artillery. My T-90s were like a fire brigade, they saved those, then others.

    P.S. I did not pay attention, but where did the 1st company of the battalion go?

  4. 1 hour ago, LUCASWILLEN05 said:

    n fact extending the timeline to allow a winter variant (say September 2017 - March 2018 would be welcome :-) Either he war lasts for a few months or the same scenario as we have now occurs but. instead of war starting in June the conflict imitates in November and pauses when the Mud Season starts. As with the current scenario allows negotiations. If we had a continuation of the original scenario one might assume the war continues following a breakdown of the talks with the situation continuing o develop from he positions at the end of August with the war continuing  during the winter - one or both sides initiate winter offensives in the hope of achieving a decisive victory

    As an option, a short-term conflict in the Baltic. During the battles in Ukraine, Russia secretly transferred mobile installations of the INF to Kaliningrad, which became known by the end of hostilities. After refusal to withdraw missiles from the region and destroy them under UN supervision. The NATO alliance is launching a ground operation to search for and destroy mobile installations. In response, Russia begins an invasion of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, which would pierce the land corridor to Kaliningrad.

    Yes, the idea is insane, but it's just a game.

  5. 1 hour ago, Rinaldi said:

    Yes, and this situation will persist so long as the Russians have national service; training a professionally-rounded NCO usually leaves you with very little time to actually put their skills to use, and you cannot bank on them volunteering at the end of their compulsary tenure. You can, however, expect a career-mentality with officers. You have a lot of O-1s and O-2s doing what E-6s and E-7s might be doing elsewhere.

    The Russian army is 'top heavy' in where officers do a lot of what NCOs may traditionally do in other militaries- and that's not necessarily a bad thing when circumstances are considered.

    I'm for the professional army, but alas, this will not happen for a long time.
    For complex soldier and sergeant positions, a soldier of a contractor is always appointed, and not a conscript's soldier. The situation could be changed if the conscription service returned 2 years, but it is better 3 years. How to encourage could be a smaller percentage of taxes after military service and the possibility of entering the civil service.

  6. In the game there is no artillery reconnaissance divisions. But to me, as I wrote earlier, an officer was assigned to the unit for calling artillery fire and correcting it. At the same time, I could do this myself, but longer.

    Extract from the instruction "INSTRUCTION FOR THE ADJUSTMENTS OF ARTILLERIC FIRE". - "ИНСТРУКЦИЯ КОРРЕКТИРОВЩИКАМ АРТИЛЛЕРИЙСКОГО ОГНЯ"

    "An artillery spotter is appointed from among officers, sergeants of artillery reconnaissance units (for example, the division's intelligence chief, commander of a platoon of command, platoon (squad) of artillery intelligence), as well as officers of combined arms units."

  7. GarlicSugar 

    The reason for the high cost is its effectiveness.
    In CMBN german tanks are twice as expensive, I played with a rival QB. I took 5 panthers and 2 companies of panzergrenadiers, the enemy used against me 2 companies of Shermans and an infantry battalion. As a result, after losing 80% of the tanks, the enemy surrendered. I lost only 1 tank.

  8. 59 minutes ago, Erwin said:

    Re PK vs PKP.  The manual doesn't mention PK, only PKP so I assumed they use same ammo.  However, the Co HQ has a PK but only 5.45mm ammo.  Other units have PKP's and carry both 5.45 and 7.62x54Rmm.  One has to have the Co and platoon HQ's acquire 7.62x54R ammo.  Is that correct?

    Edit:  Argh. I just realized that the HQ's only have PK's when they are mounted.  When dismounted they only have AK74's. 

    Also in my game the graphic for PKM in the weapon window is identical to PKP.  That may be a factor of the mounted/dismounted issue.  That's confusing.

    HQ platoon there is no single machine gun PKM / PKP, it only in the squads. HQ platoon  consists only of the platoon commander, radio operator and 1-2 snipers - if this is a company on the BMP.

    В управлении взвода нет единого пулемёта ПКМ/ПКП , он только в отделениях . Управление взвода состоит только из командира взвода , радиста и 1-2 снайперов - если это рота на БМП . 

  9. **********  SPOILERS **********

     

     

    I finished 3 mission, the impression is good. I liked how the battalion-tactical group was gradually introduced into the battle. In the 3rd mission when I was attacked by the tank company "Oplot", I had to take up defenses, after a while the incomplete company T-90AM arrived, which very much helped in my position. If it were not for the information that the tanks would arrive, I would have calculated that this reinforcement would be to stop the tank attack.

  10. The question is the current and former NATO military man.
    If a soldier buys at his own expense a uniform that differs in the form of camouflage, he will be allowed to wear it or forbid until the whole company has such a uniform.

    Вопрос нынешним и бывшим военнослужащим НАТО .
    Если солдат купит за свой счёт униформу которая отличается видом камуфляжа , ему разрешат её носить или запретят пока у всей роты не будет такой униформы .

     

  11. Virtual tour of the military base "Arctic shamrock" the Franz Josef Land Archipelago.

    Виртуальная экскурсия по военной базе «Арктический трилистник»  архипелаг  Земля Франца-Иосифа .

    http://mil.ru/files/files/arctic/Arctic.html

     

     

    Unmanned aerial vehicle of heavy class "Altair"

    Беспилотный летательный аппарат тяжелого класса «Альтаир»

    4109687_original.jpg

     

     

     

  12. PU-21 (machine gun with unified feed) , they were not accepted for service.

    The reason is simple: under the 5.45-mm cartridge they could not create the so-called. "Rakova's machine" for stuffing machine gun tape (the prototype deformed sleeves when they were laid in a tape). And without it, the tape feeding of the machine gun during the armoring of the tape was virtually manually possible only in "laboratory", but not in combat conditions.But I repeat, if the Ministry of Defense  ordered the shops for 60-90 shots, I would gladly return RPK into service.The Ministry of Internal Affairs ordered several years ago for the Internal Troops,  russian analogue of M249 machine gun.

    На вооружение не приняли .
    Причина проста: под 5,45-мм патрон так и не смогли создать т. н. «машинку Ракова» для набивки пулемётной ленты (опытный образец деформировал гильзы при их укладке в ленту). А без неё ленточное питание пулемёта при снаряжении ленты фактически вручную было возможно только в «лабораторных», но не в боевых условиях. Но повторюсь , если бы министерство обороны заказало бы магазины на 60-90 выстрелов я бы с удовольствием вернул бы РПК на вооружение .МВД несколько лет назад заказало для Внутренних войск , российский аналог пулемёта М249 .

    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ПУ-21

×
×
  • Create New...