Jump to content

Ts4EVER

Members
  • Posts

    625
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ts4EVER

  1. 52 minutes ago, billbindc said:

    One thing that still worries people is that the Russians seem so obtuse and isolated that they might not really get the message. That's why Xi made the statement about Kazakhstan and why both Xi and Modi were so blunt about Ukraine. Like Austria-Hungary then, Russia seems to be violently drifting along without quite coming to terms with what's happened. There's a strange national mental collapse going on in Moscow and while I'm happy India/China seem to be pulling in the right direction, I think a lot of folks have the nagging worry that Russia just can't hear it. We'll see. 

    Sounds like they need some kind of "intervention" by China and India. Not the normal state-like intervention, mind you, but one where Putin comes into the conference room one day and everyone is there going "It is about the invasions." and then they all read out their statements one by one etc.

  2. 6 minutes ago, The_Capt said:

    Heh, clearly never taught in US or Canada.  Unpleasant, undisciplined and lawyered up.

    I mean, it's not like I teach at fancy private schools for kids with rich and educated parents, but those Ukrainians are something else... We have started joking that they might be more useful at the front.

  3. 50 minutes ago, kevinkin said:

    Hope this is the case even at a fraction of the level cited. The number is so large it seems impossible that major news outlets are not having those special reports from the field with microphones in hand at checkpoints etc.. Bears watching. 5 million people moving back to a war torn country doesn't happen every day.  

     "If the active phase of the war lasts for a year or longer, even more people will leave the country. At least five million refugees are not expected to return home."

    https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/will-ukrainian-refugees-return-home

    Kind of feel like a dick for saying it, but as a teacher I am glad. Compared to the Syrians and Afghans, the Ukrainian children are extremely unpleasant and undisciplined. I wonder what they are doing in schools there.

  4. 20 minutes ago, ASL Veteran said:

    Yeah, price controls - that's the answer lol.  Just let the government set the price of everything.  No, there is no actual history of what happens with price controls to reference there - nope - that's definitely the answer to everyone's problems.

    Did I say that? However, history shows that targeted price controls are effective at fighting inflation, for example in Kennedy's conflict against US Steel back in the day, when they tried to raise their prices despite the wage and price guidelines in place at the time to curb inflation. He even got a nice birthday song by Marilyn Monroe out of it.

    Today all of this is largely forgotten and the only price controls our politicians are willing to implement are frozen wages "for the good of all".

  5. On 8/2/2022 at 6:59 PM, Vacillator said:

     Looks like a great map and battle which I must try at some point, but that probably doesn't make you feel any better 😉.

     

     

    Sorry for the slight offtopic, but the map, sadly is not that "great", imo. I have been to Monschau in person and to me it looks like whoever made the map got the general layout right, but misread the elevation on whatever map he was using as a reference. To illustrate my point, this is what Monschau looks like in real life:

     

    Burg Monschau

     

    The map is way too flat.

  6. 4 hours ago, Malaspina said:

    Yeah, you're right. That battle 5 is something of an afterthought I added almost at the last moment, plus quite implausible even for a semi-historical scenario. Although it must be said, again historically, that the mountains around Calavorno were not in the hands of the Axis at that time, the bridge representing the furthest distance they were able to cover in those days.

    Pity you stopped there, because then there's a battle 6 which is more (semi-) historically accurate and should quite fun...

    Don't get me wrong btw, overall the historical part of the campaign is great, the maps are amazing and I had a great time. The 5th one just kinda killed my motivation and it felt like the realistic choice to make (like irl).

  7. I finished the campaign now (well "finished"). I played the first 4 historical scenarios, which were excellent. I then started the fifth one with the Italian tanks and then decided to do the historical thing and call off the offensive. My reasons for that:

    I started in cramped setup zones under direct observation of two large hills, without any such terrain feature on my side even though we supposedly are coming down the mountains we took earlier.

    There was pre planned defender artillery placed in front of those setup zones: NEVER DO THAT, LEAST FUN THING EVER

    The only tanks capable of taking out the enemy tanks at reasonably long ranges were north of the river, where I am forced to attack a reverse slope defense at close range

    The southern setup zone was basically useless because two Stuarts that I can not take out at range except with a lucky artillery hit cover all exits. I could only advance out of there if I clear the northern bank first. Despite that, big infantry reinforcements come in down there, further cramping everything up for artillery.

    When in addition to that an enemy plane showed up, I cease fired and ended the campaign.

    If the point of that battle is to show WHY they stopped the offensive historically then well done, I guess, but not very fun and feels like a waste of time. Still got a Total Victory for the complete campaign, so I guess it is part of the plan?

×
×
  • Create New...