![](http://content.invisioncic.com/r254563/set_resources_1/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
FAI
-
Posts
320 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by FAI
-
-
Uberlurker...Originally posted by Stuka:Wow....member #1545 and only 16 posts??? Way to live under a rock there guy.
-
-
You, with all the firepower and gizmos, can afford to abide by your own military standard of conduct most of the time. The other side who fight for what they believe don't have such luxury. For them if killing, maiming and torturing their enemies (be it foreigners or fellow countrymen) gave them leverage in the fight, so be it. It's the basic of asymmetrical warfare. They don't fight the way you want them to. They fight the way they see best how to fight you.Originally posted by Splinty:After 3 tours in Iraq, I have yet to personally have seen or heard about Coalition Forces torture or deliberately try to harm anyone who wasn't trying to kill them. THAT's the difference between us and the terrorists/insurgents. If you can't figure that out Lethaface, KHunt etc., maybe you need to rethink your ethics.
-
Congratulation...???Originally posted by Field Marshal Blücher:Yesterday I took out a tree with 2 hits from a 115-mm gun from a T-62.
-
I thought pestering an MBT with hand grenades is never a good idea. Were I in a trench, I wouldn't want to attract the antention of a tank without a decent AT weapon at hand.
Hey, what about the RKG-3 AT grenades?
-
Let me guess, Famine?Originally posted by Battlefront.com:... Good thing too since the signs as of late haven't been all that good (Britney Spears is one of the Horsemen, I'm sure of it).
Steve
-
Yup A-10 Light may be my personal favorite Support mission.Originally posted by Huntarr:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Kirq:
Holly crap ! Whats that ? A10 CAS ? Looks mighty !
</font>
-
-
I still think the "Soldiers running away from dino" is the best screenshot
-
Absolutely, Its pretty hard to wage Jihad with no funds. </font>Originally posted by skelley:quote:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by MD82:
So how about we cut our use of oil and let all those bastards drink it?
I'd actually be in favor of this one..I was so pi$$ed off at the implication from Iran and Venezuela that somehow the US is hurting those countries by purchasing oil..I would love them to be left holding something of limited value while the world moves past the need for their black mud..unfortunately, seems likely to happen only in the future.
-
Mhua ha ha ha..... My stomach hurt....
-
Hey, they guy put it in words better than me. I happen to agree with his opinion. And if that one flipped you, the rest of his other articles could give you a heart attackOriginally posted by abneo3sierra:Hey Bigduke
As to the last point, I know who wrote the article he referred to. I know the man may not have been "stoned" when he actually wrote it, but it is a better than 50/50 bet.
Saddams country was providing a place for people who, indeed, were planning to attack the US, without going into retyping things, read my post about the things found there.
The rest..as I said to you in my post, if a person THINKS, themself, and comes to a conclusion, fine. I respect yours..
FAI..his whole case came to putting what someone else thought, up..that was his entire post, and as I said to you, such intellectual dishonesty, flips a switch in me, sorry FAI
edit
In all honesty, I am unsure what gives "Fred" the right to dismiss many hundreds of thousands of other war veterans, who were older than him, and participated in a tougher war than he did, as well.
-
Whoa, after all those time finally somebody commented on my sig. One of my lesser quest is complete, now that I've joined those countless other forumites whose sigs had been commented on....
-
-
Well then fantastical it isOriginally posted by YankeeDog:...
So I stand by my orginal assertion: Any scenario that pits current-tech M1s and Strykers against each other is fantastical. Get over it. Enjoy the fantasy.
Cheers,
YD
US-led invasion of Syria in 2008 is just as fantastic and as deep into a fantasy realm, and the fans enjoy the fantasy. A lot
-
What makes you think they were'nt also covering their collective posteriors when they produced the Powerpoint slides pointing to the "damning" evidence of doomsday weapons in the middle of a desert, or somewhere else?Originally posted by abneo3sierra:The CYA reports that came out later..missed them, we were too busy chasing tangos, and uncovering the mass graves in Iraq..
-
All four intel agencies named above, declared Iraq to have WMD, which was the primary reasoning behind the urgency of the war, at least, if not the actual war itself. </font>Originally posted by abneo3sierra:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by FAI:
Demographical data vs. intelligence pertaining to waging a war... Whoa, let me fetch popcorn first.
And no, the intel agencies did not provide the primary reasons for the invasion. The subsequent political handlers did.
-
Demographical data vs. intelligence pertaining to waging a war... Whoa, let me fetch popcorn first.
And no, the intel agencies did not provide the primary reasons for the invasion. The subsequent political handlers did.
-
So the CIA was wrong about it too? </font>Originally posted by abneo3sierra:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by FAI:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Clavicula_Nox:If by enclave you mean, the majority of Babil province, then I would agree with you.
-
So the CIA was wrong about it too?Originally posted by Clavicula_Nox:If by enclave you mean, the majority of Babil province, then I would agree with you. -
Back on topic, rather than to waste a Jav, it would be wiser (cheaper, at least) to throw a sh!tload of RPGs at a stationary target. Or Carl-Gustavs. Or Panzerfausts. The point is, if it was bunker/building busting that you want, there are plenty of other weapons that would the job just fine with a much lower price tab.
-
But the Saudi's hardware are (mostly) nerfed export version of the real thing.Originally posted by abneo3sierra:There are some plausible scenarios. Many of our allies in the region use US/western weapons systems. Most of those allies could have very plausible scenarios where the government fell and more radical elements took over..Saudi Arabia one huge example there.
It does make for an interesting tactical game when both sides have essentially the same equipment and you cannot depend on your opponents equipment being inferior or having weaknesses
-
But Germany quickly ditched the ZB in favor of MG42. For the Japanese, they later found out that their ZB variant was more versatile in jungle environment.Originally posted by Bastables:Germany and Japan used it as well "BREN" or ZB derivatives.
As did Chinese forces deployed against the UN in Korea.
Taliban is apparenttly using them to. But then again it's Afghanistan. There's proabbly some marks man with a Ottoman musket running around shooting at people there.
In Afghanistan, maybe not Ottoman musket, but the Enfield was quite popular there.
-
You could play 101 Airborne if you wanted cows
Javelin hits top of Abrams, no damage!
in Combat Mission Shock Force 1
Posted