Jump to content

John1966

Members
  • Posts

    683
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by John1966

  1. 35 minutes ago, RMM said:

    Sooo, this begs a thought - does the game not distinguish between the effects of regular smoke and WP? Coz there is an immense difference;

    Well the fact that WP and smoke rounds are listed separately in the ammo loadouts means that you'd assume they are handled differently.

    But I have to admit that this has always been a CM mystery to me.

    We know they have different effects in real life but we can't select which to fire and I have no actual idea what is being fired because, if there is a difference, I don't know how to tell in the game.

  2. 5 hours ago, StieliAlpha said:

    My tanks mostly travel with closed hatches and when I order them open up, the Pixeltruppen usually close the hatches quickly. In any case, I don’t see much of a difference.

    Opening the hatches makes a world of difference. I keep them unbuttoned unless the enemy is close (in which case they button up of their own accord pretty quickly anyway). And it's always worth getting some small arms fire on the AI tanks if they're unbuttoned so they close their hatches.

    If the tanks are at a distance then it'll basically decide who spots who first and that might make a difference as to who wins a tank duel.

    Although I've never "tested" it, if you're playing a big scenario, go round and unbutton all your tanks and you'll suddenly find they can see all sorts of things they couldn't see the previous turn.

  3. 1 hour ago, RMM said:

    It doesn't happen very often, but sometimes, particularly in larger battles, one is focused om other things, and don't notice that you've accidentally issued a multi-unit order.

    Curiously, I'm the other way around. I often think I've ordered a whole platoon to do a thing, only to see the lieutenant and his HQ run off on their own.

    Only use the group command when the enemy is distant so not normally a big deal.

    My favourite error on my part is dismounting the passengers off on a walk when I meant to send the vehicle itself.

  4. 1 minute ago, StieliAlpha said:

    Interesting, I found the loss of a TC in CM1 quite devastating (and tried to „hunt“ them with snipers), but I don‘t find a TC loss in CM2 too important.

    I would concur on that. The biggest problem with crew loss seems to be when a 5-man crew gets down to 3 and the guns get greyed out even though someone is listed as "gunner".

  5. I get quite excited if, at game end, my sniper got a single kill.

    Mind you, I'm doing Road to Nijmegen at the moment and if you lose your FO (who is the only person who can call in CAS or the stuff that makes really loud bangs), he's out for the rest of the campaign. Playing last night and I heard "End of mission" after a single spotting round. Puzzled, I looked at the FO unit and all the arty was "DENIED". Somebody had got the team leader! As he was over 600m from the nearest enemy unit, I assume it must have been a sniper.

    So they do have a point but they only seem the luck out for the AI. 🧐

  6. On 3/31/2014 at 7:25 PM, Lahm said:

    The hotel gives you as much points as the two plasmolen objs and the windmill insures you a victory (200vps > 150vps)

    I did that and got a tactical defeat (my best result in three attempts).

    I'd won the first 4 missions (German surrender in all cases) but I've got completely stuck on this one. It might be (just) winnable but it says you'll need your forces to defend in a later mission.

    As I assume your paratroopers are not going to get resupplied, they'll also be having to do it with hardly any ammunition too.

    So I've decided the best way to handle this one is cease fire on the first turn resulting in a defeat but at least you'll have your force intact with a full loadout to deal with whichever mission they're next required in.

  7. I'd actually called off the airstrike at this point too. This was nearly a minute later.

    I did get radio chatter of "STOP!!! STOP!!!" straight after the friendly fire so I can't complain the immersion was broken.

    Believe it or not it happened again later in the scenario (after a strike was called off).

    But there were only lightly wounded (no actual casualties) so I didn't bother with a screenshot (and strangely nobody shouted "STOP!!! STOP!!!").

  8. 14 minutes ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

    Does anyone know if it makes a bigger difference in a campaign format (ie: are wounded dudes who receive buddy aid more likely to appear in the next mission regardless of the campaign script)?

    Don't quote me on this but I thought anyone who was a proper casualty (as opposed to light wounded) was out for the duration. Back to Blighty or out for weeks/months.

  9. 11 hours ago, Warts 'n' all said:

    It looks like a not so perfect Sunday.

    Well spotted on the scenario.

    Still got a tactical victory.

    Only points I didn't get was for not keeping 80% of my force intact. Didn't get my calculator out but I suspect this was the incident that took me over the line.

  10. I know that in the great scheme of VPs etc. that this doesn't matter (I think) but I'm curious.

    I played a scenario in which I took only two casualties.

    Both had the light red cross base (as opposed to the dark red skull & crossbones) so both wounded rather than dead.

    One was buddy aided off and one wasn't (scenario ended soon after he was wounded).

    In the AAR I expected to see 2 wounded, 0 dead.

    But actually there was 1 wounded and 1 dead.

    So what happened to my pixeltruppen? They don't die if you don't buddy aid them (as far as I'm aware - I've had loads of non-buddy aided wounded before and they weren't all dead in the AAR).

    Can they expire after evac?

    Either case would be realistic but they don't go from wounded to dead during a game, so why after?

    Never noticed it before as there's usually too many casualties. Only noticed here because of the low numbers.

    Which one expired and why?

     

  11. 8 hours ago, BornGinger said:

    Good for me there was a wooden fence some distance in front of a forest.

    Isn't this technically cheating? ;)

    8 hours ago, George MC said:

    SOP -I aim to have vehicles follow the same break in the fence/hedge to avoid giving too much info away.

    I try to do this to stop all my tanks getting damaged tracks.

    12 hours ago, Warts 'n' all said:

    Wasn't it Sun Tzu who said, "Never tell your enemy your secret plans."? 

    I think @JoMc67 just told me one of his. ;)

    8 hours ago, Warts 'n' all said:

    I vaguely remember some years back this topic cropped up, and a video was posted of an invisible tank making a hole in a fence.

    Of course, they could just have invisible tanks. 😲

×
×
  • Create New...