DalmatiaPartisan

howcome I m 15th now? I was nr 8 last month? and also-it seems that player Gandalf didnt report his loss to me last month?!

howcome I m 15th now? I was nr 8 last month? and also-it seems that player Gandalf didnt report his loss to me last month?!

Dalmatia Partisan signs in

Gandalf I guess U forgot to post your loss against me

Irish Guards-I guess U forgot to post your loss against me so plz do it

U forgot to post our game result so plz do it thanks

Dal lost to cro panzer(allied)-cant remember bid

Dal(axis) lost to Wachtmeister-bid was 175-i think. congrat to Wacht

to Shaka and Zap thank U for your kind notes. I just downloaded chess rating rules via net- I ll try to make some job about it. Problem is- I m working all day and on weekends not at home-anyway I ll give my best to calculate points as i n chess and make paralel ladder to zapp - anyway maybe the combination of these two systems will work somehow...

well Shaka I guess U got me wrong-I really enjoy playing ladder games-anyway-my suggestion was only in domain of suggestion - I d just like ladder to look better-Zap did great work of course - I didnt mean to say anything against his work. All I wanna is improvemet_Id love to have more time to make it my way - best way is that battlefront should do something about it-if possible

This topic would for sure take someone s time-but anyway I d love to make it that way.As first we must make clear rules how to make points. As second someone must be idealistic and take some time to do that job... I also suggest info about players should basicly involve players nationality(state s banner!-as in tournamenthouse site). Anyway-this was only suggestion-maybe people from battlefront should do something about this...also-I m a little bit sorry that other players show a little interest about this

BY MY OPPINION-MOST OF THE PLAYERS PLAY TCP-IP GAMES ON LADDER

I ll be short and direct this ladder system requires improvements. I think the best way is to make something similar to the chess rating rules. This means-all the players start with the same rating (1600) and going up or down with the points they earn or lose against other players. The amount of the points U get or lose is also determined by yours and opponents rating(in points).Plz enter your suggestions and comments. If I understood well-ladder system we have now gives U no chance to go up if playing against players lower on ladder. This takes away competition spirit. at least to me. Playing against player with a good rating could give U aprox +100 points(depending on your score), while playing worse rated players and win could give U only few points. Anyway-I m satisfied with ladder system we have and enjoying it, but if we can do better and more interesting...why not... [ February 14, 2003, 02:02 PM: Message edited by: DalmatiaPartisan ]

terif(allied) won dalmatian(axis).bid was 150. congrat to Terif

u need to go on opponet finder forum

disagree its the germans who had initiative in the begging of the war if U forgot- this is historicly based game-at least in the beggining-lol

I agree-when Warszaw falls -Poland falls-anyway its not that "big problem" in this game so no need for change-my oppinion

Also there were many other fractions in Yug - like "Ljotics" in serbia, "Domobrans" in Croatia...It seems that nazi-s made nations uprising on purpose to rule Yugoslavia as simple as they could. Yugoslav army before germans attack was in very weak condition.Lots of people were freightened of german war machine Old weapons,poor morale and foreign agents made clear that defense had no chance. Although there wasnt any real defense. One of modern weapons were french airplanes- i think "Dornier". On the other hand partisans couldnt count on any help from allies or USSR in the first days of war - british helped a lot to chetnics with materials, weapons ...and that was all because they were considered as a royalistic force to fight germans. reality looked different - chetnics didnt fight germans and afterwards they fight against partisans - mostly used as infantry during italians artilery and aerial attacks.

also there s one thing i forgot sea wolf suggestion about dividing yugoslavia is good but needs bigger map-and that automatically brings more problems. anyway-partisans were mainly stationed in bosnia and dalmatia-beacause of mountains and woods.they were high mobile army often changing their territory control-thats the way they survived. serbia wasnt neutral teritory-it was under direct control of axis with chetnicks helping them against partisans. there wasnt any serious partisans movement in serbia till the late years of war.serbian peasants were royalistic(mainly) and simpatized chetnics and ortodox church. communists movement was very weak but people who wanted to fight nazi-s didnt have any other choice than to join partisans

great topic! interesting for me (Croat) because my grandpa was partisan commander. although Yugoslavia fell down so early when attacked - southern yugoslav forces kicked Italian asses and came to the starting positions in attacking Drac(Albanian city). the main reason of such a short defeat is defetism - and also other nations didnt want to be in so called "nations prison" royalistic Yugoslavia under Serbs monarchy. anyway in your replies are few errors - but I ll write about them more next time.

Note for ZAPPSWEDEN or CRUZZER I ve played game against Cruzzer week ago and he still didnt report his loss to forum plz do something about it seeya

NOTE FOR CRUZZER: plz report my online victory against U(if U forgot) thanks

Dalmatianpartisan(axis) concedes to GeneralRaus(all). handicap was 100 congratulations

cruzzer(allied) concedes to DalmatiaPartisan(Axis). handicap was 175. i know that losing side should report game but still,...my first online victory Anyway-good game- Cruzzer wasnt really lucky with his naval forces-they were dissapointing.

I sign up to the ladder I was lonewolfdark on the ladder before-some problems accured so sign out lonewolfdark and sign in DP danke