Jump to content

Iron Ranger

Members
  • Posts

    1,040
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Iron Ranger

  1. Wow has this thread gone off the mark!

    DT some very nice points, and I was making an extreme example with the 'stupid' rules. What I and I think others were trying to point out is that SC (one or two) is a simple war game based around WW2 (beer and chips please). Not a historical sim on WW2, in fact I dont know of anywhere that they push that feature. And I do understand your fear (?) that people are trying to drive it away from what it is ment to be post 'gold'.

    The AI sucks, and it will suck in general. Its going to be damn near impossiable to make one 1/2 as good as the best players and at best close to the average players. This needs to improve and from HC's past work I'm sure he'll do his best. The fact that you can go back to the end of SC1 and see that people were pointing this out (see my last post on SC1 forums)only shows that this issue is not new. One of the most important issues on needing a better AI is the lack of HvH that you can get right now. Long on IRC and find me a time when you can easly(!) find someone to play. Perhaps you need to live in eroupe to do this as few of the US players seam to be online.

    Editor, I didnt by the game to program and I'm not happy with those that point to this as the end all save all solution. I"m happy that those that wish to use it, and will try thier mods. But again, using this as a defence to people's constructive critisum is unwise. Make notes of thier complaints and ask for more detail if needed... like DD has in the past.

    The 'I give up' factor in SC. This has to be one of the major reason's I left this forum / game. Both as I was disapointed in other peoples unwillingness to play it through and my own 'droping' of games that were unwinnable (but still playable). I'm already starting to see it again so perhaps that German league is where I'll end up, but if people want to play pvp then they better damn well play it till close to the end or they will soon run out of people interested in playing them.

    "ahh well I put 5 chits in Russia with UK and not one hit.. lost egypt in spring 1940. I give up.. say want to play again?" Now wtf .... forget it I'm on a rampage!

    Ok.. bottom like. This guy is leaving, he said why and I think thats in a hope someone will fix them. Good luck HC or perhaps these problems are not really problems for they game design / area you want SC2 to be considered in.

  2. Once you decide not to take it seriously as an historical sim, SC2 is a lot more fun.

    I think if you go all the way back to the early days of SC1 you will see many of the 'known' players repeating this or pointing it out.

    Its a beer and chips smile.gif game thats 'balanced'.

    If it was a historical sim, why would anyone play Axis? You would have to build in 'stupid' scripts for them.

    Script "AH has disided that all units in France must attack.. no matter how damaged or location. You can not end the turn untill all units in this country (including HQs) have done this"

  3. Nov 2 1941

    The axis show thier hand in Egypt. Two bombers work over the citys while the Para unit drops into an undefended Amman. With the Italian marines comming and smashing the UK air on the beachs they deside to make a quick dash back to Iraq and rethink what they are going to with the Africa Korps and this guy Rommel.

    Russia, disturbed by what is happening in Egypt makes ready for war and the Axis respond in kind. The border is full of troops ready to invade the motherland for the fatherland.

    Western Eroupe is quiet with minor air battles over Brest.

×
×
  • Create New...