-
Posts
9,609 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Posts posted by Vanir Ausf B
-
-
-
41 minutes ago, akd said:
Crazy. You can actually see shrapnel bounce off the road and hit this guy:
Paging @Thomm
On 4/7/2022 at 2:26 PM, Thomm said:Actually, my real question is: Why do we not see more airburst artillery shells in use?
Are they too rare? Too expensive? Out of fashion?
Best regards,
Thomm -
-
I was just looking over the Wiki page for the German Puma IFV. Unit cost $22 million, 2.5x M1A2 Abrams.
-
1 hour ago, Larsen said:
Taht is a direct way to compare unit. Otherwise is all super empirical and much more subjective.
You said yourself that different sources give the cost of a T-90A as "1.5M to 3.5M". So does a M1A2 tank cost 6x T-90A or 2.5x? Who decides that and how is that not subjective?
Wikipedia gives the unit cost of a M4A1 rifle as $700. What does Russia pay for an AK-74M? Wiki doesn't say.
The unit cost of any manufactured item is also going to be influenced by how many of them are made because the R&D cost is spread over each unit and economies of scale. That has nothing to do with battlefield performance.
-
3 hours ago, Larsen said:
But they BMP-3Ms are a bit overpriced and so are the Russian tanks compared to Bradleys and M1A3SEP.
BMP-3Ms are fantastic. I buy them without hesitation.
-
3 hours ago, Larsen said:
That could be because there are some new shells that offer increased penetration.
It's called 3BM59 Svinets-1, and all Russian tanks in CMBS use it, which is overly optimistic since it wouldn't fit in the T-72 or T-90A autoloader.
-
Ok, thanks. Maybe it will get in.
But don't hold your breath for the 2A82-1M. There are a lot of conflicting sources on that.
"The main armament of the T-90M Model 2017 Proryv-3 consists of one 125 mm 2A46M-4 smoothbore gun"
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/t90m.htm
"The T-90M is armed with a new 2A46M-4 gun"
-
2 minutes ago, Larsen said:
So you spend 400 points to watch the battlefield. It has an advantages of course but for pretty much the same price you can get T-90A.
400 points for an unkillable spy in the sky is a bargain, IMO. In my Black Sea-PBEMing days we banned them from QBs.
2 minutes ago, Larsen said:Well, the US stuff is more expensive all around. It is also better. Who buys trucks in QBs? For Russian I think hey are useful as they carry extra HE shells for mortars. Not sure what the US side uses them.
I think that Tunguska is underpriced too. The wiki gives a unit cost of $16M. That is about twice as much as M1A2. And that might feel like too much but Tunguska basically leaves the US side without any way to use drones or air power.
If you made Tunguskas cost 1300 points I doubt anyone would ever buy one, although they probably are underpriced currently.
-
9 minutes ago, Larsen said:
I saw a report somewhere that the first 10 unites were delivered in 2017. I can again look for the article if BCF really would take a note.
Yes. See if you can find that.
There are lots of things in the game that were "speculative" that did not pan out in reality. Those units can't be removed, unfortunately. But my impression is that they are nevertheless not going to extend the time frame beyond 2017. So Ukraine will probably not get Javelins because they didn't until 2018.
-
Heck of a speed trap.
-
1.5M to 3.5M is a pretty big range.
Try running your Stinger test against the Russian Zala drone.
I tried looking up the cost of a Ural-4320 truck. I can't find what the Russian government pays for them, but in mint condition they go for $26,000. Per unit cost for a US FMTV A1R is $160,427. I think people may complain if US trucks cost 6 times Russian trucks
https://fourtankmen.com/why-ural-4320-is-the-best-russian-military-truck/
-
The same was true of the T-90m in 2017. The first units were delivered to the Russian Army in 2020 or 2021.
-
Mmm, so assuming "ballpark" is good enough, why would this system be better than the current system?
-
As the manual states, the T-90AM is based on the T-90MS. Unless BFC changes their mind there will not be anything added from post-2017.
-
Others give different answers, e.g. https://www.army-technology.com/projects/t-90ms-main-battle-tank/
The main armament of the tank is a 125mm 2A46M-5
I just remembered there was a debate on this forum between two Russians who disagreed on what cannon the T-90m sported.
Installing 2A82 for the T-90 would require a larger ammunition carousel. That's a significant redesign of the hull.
-
I think there is no chance BFC will use dollar value of units for QB cost. It's not even a straightforward calculation. Do you adjust for purchase price parity? Do we use export cost or domestic procurement numbers? Do we even know what the Russian government pays for a T-90?
-
18 minutes ago, Larsen said:
if that is the case then they got the gun wrong. The new gun on T-90M is the same gun they are installing on T-14. It is not 2A46M (L48). The new gun is 2A82-1M (which is eithe rL55 or L56 and offers better penetration).
Do you have a source for that?
-
-
Anything with an M2 .50 cal, so some half tracks do also.
-
12 minutes ago, Homo_Ferricus said:
Watch from 0:56-1:03 you can see just as the fire flares into what looks like is about to be a catastrophic kill, it is suddenly put out almost completely.
I don't know why, but sometimes the internal ammo cook-off blows the turret and sometimes it doesn't.
-
4 minutes ago, sburke said:
no flank security whatsoever. Nice.
The dilemma with these convoys is that if you have serious flank security your convoy moves as fast as the infantry can walk (through trees and mud, no less).
-
This is awkward.
QuotePoland has said it will hand over its MiG-29 fighter jets to the US, in a move which appeared to take Washington by surprise and was quickly dismissed by the Pentagon.
The Polish foreign minister, Zbigniew Rau, said his government was “ready to deploy – immediately and free of charge – all their MiG-29 jets to the Ramstein airbase and place them at the disposal of the government of the United States of America”.
But the Pentagon appeared to reject the proposal, saying it was not “tenable”.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/08/poland-mig-29-jets-us-ukraine
-
2 minutes ago, BeondTheGrave said:
Take one example: this battalion combat group.
From what I have seen and heard, Russian units are rarely fighting as a coherent BTG. Rather, they are breaking down into (mostly) platoon-sized elements that operate semi-independently. This has worked poorly to say the least.
How Hot is Ukraine Gonna Get?
in Combat Mission Black Sea
Posted
They screwed up by not keeping the turret rotated towards the enemy while in LOS.