Jump to content
Battlefront is now Slitherine ×

Scipio

Members
  • Posts

    2,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Scipio

  1. Here is the TO&E for a German Jaeger Company HQ & a Platoon HQ (December 43) 1 Company Commander - 1 Pistol, 1 SMG, 1 Horse 1 Company Troop Leader - 1 SMG 1 Commander of Battle Vehicels (also food Master) - 1 SMG 1 Medical NCO - 1 Pistol, 1 Bycicle 2 Bycicle Messengers - 2 SMG, 2Bycicles 1 Messenger - 1 SMG 4 Radio Operators - 4 SMG, 4 Radios 1 Assistant Weapon Master - 1 Rifle 2 Horse Leaders for Jf8 Infantry cart - 2 Rifles, 1 Jf8 Infantry cart, 2 Draft Horses 1 Horse Attendant for Officer's horse - 1 Rifle That's 15 men with 1 SMG + 1 Pistol, 1 Pistol, 9 SMGs and 4 rifles. Additionaly the Company has a Field Train & Admin Staff with 4 NCOs & 16 men - 18 Rifles, 1 SMG & 1 LMG In CM, the Gebirgsjaeger Company HQ has only 6 men with 2 Pistols, 3 SMGs and one Rifle. The TO&E could look like this: 1 Company Leader - 1 Pistol 1 Medical NCO - 1 Pistol 2 Radio Operators - 2 SMG 1 Messenger - 1 SMG 1 Horse Attendant - 1 Rifle BTW, the TO&E for a US Mountain Infantry Company (November 44) shows 2 Officers, 5 NCOs and 28 Privates. Each men was equipted with a .30cal M1 carbine. Additional equipment: 6 .45 SMG & 2 Bazookas. It is not specifically written down, but I assume the Field Train is included. The TO&E for German Jaeger Platoon HQ (December 43): 1 Platoon Leader - 1 Pistol & 1 SMG 2 Messengers - 2 SMGs 1 Stretcher Bearer - 1 Pistol 1 Horse Leader - 1 Rifle In CM we have one less SMG. Let's assume one messenger is absent. The source for the German TO&E: American Historical Association Commitee for the Study of War Documents, Washington DC US TO&E : US Army Historical Center, Carlisle Barracks, PA So, the HQs were in reality much stronger then we have them in CM. Maybe this is something that should be corrected? [ May 03, 2002, 03:45 AM: Message edited by: Scipio ]
  2. Iwonder why only the Allies has 'VT' shells. Artillery shells that explode overground where used by all nations, already in World War One. I hope the artillery system will be dramatically revised for CM:BB - IMO it is absolutly unrealistic.
  3. Have a good life [ April 07, 2002, 03:56 PM: Message edited by: Scipio ]
  4. It is known that the CM artillery system is not very realistic.
  5. I (as PC user) am curious : which picture format need the mac exactly?
  6. Folks, I'm sorry, must have happend when I maintained the site. The broken link is fixed now. Lawyer Yes, I recomment to download them again, cause I made many updates around Chrismas last year.
  7. To all : thanks Deerslayer : I don't understand, please clarify.
  8. Gordon, please excuse me. I didn't wanted to say what you have read in my words, nevertheless I'm responsible for it. And when the stones start to roll...
  9. Not necessary, the doctor has forbidden me to post further on this forum. He said it causes to much stress. Anyway, I hope you all will still have fun with my current and coming mods, even if no one would admit it Okay, they are coming for me. Thanks and goodbye.
  10. Folks, just see the truth: I'm a wanker, and I don't support CMMOS because my low IQ doesn't allow me to create this mysterious ruleset thingys, while my bad experience (and my paranoid mind) doesn't allow me to let it do by a third party. I'm pretty sure that it was Gordon's plan to exclude me when he developed the rulesets. Anyway, I hope you still love me, and maybe you can visit me in the asylum. I must close now, cause I have a date for an e-shock therapy.
  11. Thanks! :cool: P.S.: For both! I wish I could make so beautiful mods like you. [ March 26, 2002, 06:48 PM: Message edited by: Scipio ]
  12. Gordon, just read my signature again. We let the people decide who is the bigger idiot. Me, cause I am, or you, cause you take me serious? :cool: Thanks, and have a good night, too.
  13. Gordon, we know that I didn't meant you. Anyway, I have made my experience, and I wasn't amused. If you feel pissed because a modmaker is so impudent and won't support your CMMOS empire, it's your problem, but it tells me everything I need to know about it. I guess I have the good right to see CMMOS not as the sacrosanct right and only way. I can't remember that Madmatt ever did something else to clear a situation than telling us to clear our problems on our own and leave him in peace. And a final word: all my mods are of lowest quality, so I'm pretty sure that no one uses them any way, so who ****ing cares that they are not CMMOS compatible? For everything else you want to know, read my signature.
  14. I should have better said : 100% - my mods. I was once cheated by a member of the CMMOS community. So I don't support it. [ March 26, 2002, 03:56 PM: Message edited by: Scipio ]
  15. Visit the CM mod section of WarfareHQ. I hope you are pleased. [ March 26, 2002, 03:55 PM: Message edited by: Scipio ]
  16. Fernando, Michael Thanks for the advise, I will look into this. Are you sure the soldier isn't just too small? Gordon I still have doubts, but I will check CMMOS again. BTW, don't mix up the current tool with the new one. [ March 16, 2002, 10:35 AM: Message edited by: Scipio ]
  17. Gordon Excuse the missunderstanding. I didn't knew that Cmmos can do this. Nevertheless it's a simple math : I tried several times to work with Cmmos. I even don't understand the basics, because my IQ is very low. I would need at least one week to make CMMOS do what I want him to do. I need 3 days to program something own. :cool: [ March 15, 2002, 11:35 PM: Message edited by: Scipio ]
  18. You (BTS) always say that the Wehrmacht soldiers on the CM:BB screenshots show the old CM:BO textures. Can I assume that the 3d-model for the soldiers will not be revised? This would be fine, cause then we can still use the good CM:Bo mods. Especially mine My wish list: Give the tank crew an own texture for the leg. Use different sound files for recoiless rifles and Panzerfausts/-schrecks.
  19. Gordon The CMMOS can share graphics for different units? With all respect, please wait til you see the tool before you pull out the club.
  20. Michael I guess the guy needs a complete new head But before I start to make faces I want to make an SS-camo set. Lord Dragon Ehm...I guess less then one week. I use a standardized gear-set that makes it relative easy and fast. Hoopenfaust Sorry, but it will me more worse then cmmos, cause I use a selfprogrammed tool for Windows. The pure mass of alternatives and the function to exchange the camos between all branches (except SS) makes it a must - cmmos can't handle this anymore. I have often asked for a mac-programmer to convert this, but no response yet. If you know one...
  21. I was often criticed because I'm to idle to equip my soldiers with gear. Well, if you prayed for it : The Splinter, early, backside The Splinter, fall, frontside This and a handfull more camo patterns coming soon. Constructive critics are welcome.
×
×
  • Create New...