hi to all, thought this would be of interest to this threed hope you enjoy THE TRUTH BEHIND SAVEING PVT RYAN .In late July 1998 the film 'Saving Private Ryan' will open in theaters in the USA. This is Steven Speilberg's grand attempt at a WW2 film. In most editions of the script, the film opens with the title "Based on a true story." We do not know if this will be in the final cut. (Note: at some point shortly before the film opened, they dropped this. Why? no one is saying, but the rumors are that either they realized it was so far from reality they could not get away with it, or else that it opened them to a lawsuit from some families. We've got the script here to prove they were going to though...)
Is it? Is it really?
The story revolves around the Normandy invasion in WW2. So far, both the invasion and the war actually happened. It seems that Private Ryan, a paratrooper, has been dropped behind German lines (by accident). Sadly, he has had three brothers killed: one on Omaha, one on Utah, and a third in the Pacific. In order that Ryan's mother be spared getting news that all four sons were killed, he is ordered from combat. Nice try, but he's behind German lines. How to get him out?
The truth- Ryan is based on a 506th P.I.R. trooper who did have one brother killed at both Omaha and Utah beach. His 4th brother was missing in the Pacific, but later located and survived the war. The military ruling about sole surviving son being allowed out of combat is real. The soldier in question was dropped behind German lines. Many paratroopers were mis-dropped all over Normandy- he was one of many in this situation.
In the film an understrength squad of Rangers, led by a Ranger Captain (Tom Hanks) is sent behind German lines to find Ryan and bring him out. They travel through German held terrain, risking life and limb, then find Ryan and a small group of Para's trying to hold onto a key bridge. But wait- there's more! The bridge is about to be attacked by German Tiger tanks. Will they save the bridge, and the invasion, and make a ton of money for Dreamworks? Go see the film.
In reality, the missing trooper spent about 18 days behind German lines evading patrols with the help of local French civilians. He finally walked into US territory on his own. When he reported in he was told, "oh, we've been looking for you." and a Chaplain drove him down to the beach in a jeep. No rescue, no risking a group of men to save one, no bridge, and no bloody TIGER tanks either! (The Tigers were further west in the British sector).
But... the main part of the story is the rescue attempt by Tom Hanks and Co. Hanks is the star of the film, and thus this action IS the main part of the film. As there was no rescue attempt (they had no way of knowing where to look in any case) the basis for the MAIN part of the film is not true. Neither is the bridge defense against Tiger tanks (guess what? they were lots of other German tanks in the war besides Tigers. Also guns other than 88's. Hollywood has yet to figure this out.) Of course, legally, the film is based upon the missing 506th paratrooper, and the fact that the Americans did invade Normandy in WW2.
(Curiously, quite recently the production company has been distancing themselves from the 506th story, and making claims of a 'fictional story loosely based on the 5 Sullivan Brothers.' Very curious. Might it be that after spending a ton of money of the film they discovered that no one had gotten permission from the family? Or could they have decided they went too far from reality and could no longer claim it to be true? Only Dreamworks and Co. know for sure)
Why is this film dangerous? Because after making films such as Schindler's List and Amistad, which were touted for being "real history", this film is not. It is a fictional story placed in what seems like "real history." Mark my words- in 2 years this film will be used in schools to 'teach' WW2. Many people will think that the entire story is true. For the vast majority of the population this film will BE the invasion of Normandy. Does it matter? Yes it darn well does! Anyone that has spent any time at all interviewing veterans can come up with a bunch of real stories that rival this one. By making up the story, they cheapen what the vets really did. They ignore the real sacrifices. And isn't it so nice that the Army thinks so much of our sons that they will risk a handful of men to save one.
Go see the film. Enjoy it. I am sure it is well made and great fun. Nit pick on the historical details (there's some very good stuff in it, also some botched things: you spot the difference!), But know that it is not reality. Reality was just as, if not more, thrilling and exciting (but more bloody, if that is possible). The catchphrase on the set was "We're making a movie, not a documentary." Just keep that in mind.