Jump to content

SuperTed

Members
  • Posts

    2,711
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by SuperTed

  1. Originally posted by Ancient One:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by SuperTed:

    So, the minor allies will be largely ineffective, as they should be.

    Even the Canadians? :eek: Historically, Canadians were the highest quality troops the Allies had.</font>
  2. Straha,

    I seem to have neglected a point that you exposed. ;)

    HQ units only affect forces of their own nationality. So, the minor allies will be largely ineffective, as they should be. I believe this is the answer to the inexpensive garrison question. ;)

  3. Guys,

    Look at this from an abstract point of view. Now, I agree that a Channel crossing in January would be more risky than in June, but not impossible.

    If you consider the structure of the turn system, it makes sense. Namely, since there are four times the turns in summer as in winter, think of it as being four times more likely that a Channel crossing would work in June than in January.

    You can apply the same approach to weather effects on air units (and any other units, for that matter). It boils down to "things" being four times easier in the summer as they are in the winter.

    Is a 4:1 ratio arbitrary? Perhaps, but that's not the point. The point is that it is an abstraction that attempts to account for inumerable varibles (not the least of whcih is the weather) without getting bogged down in trying to account for each individual variable.

    I hope that helps clarify things.

  4. Guys,

    The basic units (corps, armies, etc.) have the same ratings. The biggest difference will be found in the quality of the HQ units. As an example, Germany starts with two HQ units (Bock and Runstedt) and Poland has none (I am pretty sure none of the minors have HQ units). Also, France starts without an HQ unit, making them little or no threat to the Germans.

    Since HQ units act as a supply point and greatly improve the readiness of attached units, having good ones and enough of them is vital to the success of any nation.

    German HQ units are generally superior to their Allied counterparts, especially early in the war. This is probably the biggest single reason why the Germans are so successful early in the war. Oddly enough, some may argue the same thing happened in that little shindig called World War II. ;)

    Of course, research will have an impact as well. But this impact is limited to specific units.

    So, when you are looking for national "personalities," look no further than the HQ units.

  5. Originally posted by Immer Etwas:

    Super Ted -- your final AAR map shows where you have strengthened the Scharnhorst -- does this mean that the research advance, gun-laying radar, was ALREADY available to the Germans (... this allows an increase over & above size 10)?

    If so, that means other countries might have certain research advances before the War even begins?

    Also, Kiel does not appear to be a two-front port. Does this mean that Germany cannot exit directly into the Atlantic -- only into the Baltic?

    IE,

    The Germans start with one point in each of three categories (Advanced Subs, Gun Laying Radar, and Rockets). To be honest, I don't know if this affects the maximum strength for units. Hubert would be able to answer that.

    Other countries could well have research advances in place, but I have only played from the Axis side. So, I don't know for sure, but I would assume there would be some for the Allies too.

    Kiel is on the Baltic only. The canal is not modeled. Considering the strength of the British fleet, I like it this way. smile.gif

  6. Originally posted by Epée:

    Superted, thanks for the AAR.

    Have you already played out the next months? Or are you willing to discuss plans?

    Are you going for Sealion? Gibraltar? Preemptive attack on Russia and leaving France alone?

    Christian

    Christian,

    I am not playing ahead. I have been playing a turn, taking screenshots along the way. Then, I edit the screenshots and write the AARs. It's a slow process, but I hope to give everybody a good idea of what I'm doing (then, somebody can tell me so I know :eek: ).

    If you go to the top of the first page of this thread, you'll see the link to "War Is Declared!" I outline my general plan in there.

    Hint: I hope to be facing only the US and USSR at some point. ;)

  7. Originally posted by BloodyBucket:

    SuperTed,

    Excellent AAR. You should have been a war correspondent.

    In the screenshot that "Northern Flank" links to, you show a tank unit moving through three hexes that are next to the Polish infantry. I assume this is because the Polish unit is now revealed by the actions of the other tank unit, and that you can move through friendly occupied hexes?

    BB,

    Aw, shucks. redface.gif

    Yup.

  8. Originally posted by Barticus:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by SuperTed:

    Elmo,

    Hubert and I wanted to be sure we were on the same page with the first couple installments. Now that we are, I can post whatever I want. So, the X-rated versions are a go! :eek:

    Whuzzat, sex AND wargaming!? :D

    Together?!!! :eek:

    Is that legal? :confused:

    B[/QB]</font>

×
×
  • Create New...