Crimguy Posted January 14, 2003 Share Posted January 14, 2003 Anyone try these drivers? While helping in some applications, I'm finding CMBB to be a slideshow, and I've got a fairly beefy system. Asus GeForce 4 4400 Soyo Dragon Plus Athlon XP1600 512mb PC2700 [ January 14, 2003, 12:09 AM: Message edited by: Crimguy ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWB Posted January 14, 2003 Share Posted January 14, 2003 Somewhat similar to the system I have(XP 2000+, Ti4400, Abit A7V8X). I am using the 41.09s at the moment, CM has no issues so long as FSAA is disabled. What settings are you using? Do you have FSAA on and is CM looking good? WWB 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimguy Posted January 14, 2003 Author Share Posted January 14, 2003 I have FSAA disabled, Aniso disabled. Can't seem to get coolbits working, so my tweak options are limited. CMBB looks terrible with these drivers - very pixelated, yet 3d seems to be enabled (I can see transparencies, etc.) I went back to 30.82. My setup just doesn't seem to like any of the 4x.xx series drivers. Got my best 3DMark scores with the 42.01 drivers, but scores aren't every thing I guess 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schrullenhaft Posted January 14, 2003 Share Posted January 14, 2003 Image quality is often sacrificed for performance. What you were seeing seems quite reasonable... the drivers have been optimized for performance. NVidia seems to 'rotate' their image quality and performance drivers every so often; some driver versions offer better image quality while others offer better performance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.