Jump to content

Soviets never used Canister Rounds?


Recommended Posts

Now I'm no WWII expert, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night. Hehe I had to, couldn't resist. :D

But I just so happened to read the second chapter of "T-34 In Action" a few hours ago. It discusses all kinds of tech specs about the tank like the engine, tracks, transmission, hatches, gunsights, ammo, etc. It's primarliy about the early war models and some briefly about the T-34/85. But since the earlier models supposedly used the canister shells the most when compared to the later models. I was surprised that the canister round wasn't mentioned at all. It only mentioned AP, HE, and tungsten shells.

Not that this is definitive or anything and I really don't even care. I bought the book for the memoirs which appear to start in the next chapter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should really just be shrapnel. As in small bursting charge with steel balls inside, instead of pure HE. Russians still used it, everyone else concluded in WW I that plain HE was superior (the weight better spent on HE to make small high velocity fragments).

And it is way, way overmodeled. Particularly against cover, but just in general. The same number of bullets individually aimed do far less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RCMP,

A search should reveal some long threads on this. Meanwhile, you'll see from this www.Battlefield.ru ammo list that the guns fired canister and/or shrapnel

http://www.battlefield.ru/content/view/149/64/lang,en/

Here's a then Secret Order of the Commander in Chief of the Western Front pointedly reminding his artillerymen to use shrapnel against exposed personnel targets in the listed range bracket. The author? Some guy named Zhukov!

http://www.battlefield.ru/content/view/292/123/lang,en/

Here's the result of search using "Russian shrapnel rounds" as the phrase on this Forum.

Some very groggy reading ahead of you!

http://www.battlefront.com/community/search.php?searchid=32967

Regards,

John Kettler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...