Jump to content

Source material - Osprey Men at Arms 113 (Warrior Series) US Army Soldier 2003-04


Recommended Posts

Just picked this book up along with three other new Osprey titles called German Infantryman. The German ones are execrable. One even has a cover photo of an artillery piece. :rolleyes: They're mostly terrible.

The US book seems good (the actual title is US Army Soldier Baghdad 2003-04 but I didn't want the subject line to seem contentious) but I am not an expert...more importantly, I guess I want to ask if anyone else has read it, and is there anything of value in it in regards to crafting US-Syrian scenarios for CM:SF? Or rather, any glaring errors we would be wise to avoid in doing so, or simply explanations of practices that would somehow apply to Iraq but not a hypothetical incursion into Syria?

Is it possible the book is already out of date as far as extrapolating current US Army practices?

Anyone have just a general impression of the book they want to share?

And hey - are any of you IN it? smile.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(Never pass up the opportunity to go head to head with the one and only Michael Dorosh)

Osprey...?

hmm...

I do like/enjoy/use *some* Osprey publications, especially when painting miniatures etc... but I'm not sure that they'd qualify as either professional or academic sources. They seem for the most part to be more like History of Warfare for Dummies books. I am not familiar with the book in question, nor with current US Doctrine so I can't really comment on how valid it is. All I can say is: Osprey as a source? Are you grog enough? tongue.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Osprey has changed its image in the past few years though. The recent series THE GERMAN ARMY for example, has some brilliant sidebars and contains info on such things as auxiliaries and civilian officers (Beamten) that aren't to be found in other mainstream sources. They are still uneven - GERMAN INFANTRYMAN highlights that - but there are some real gems among them now.

I think your comments on Osprey were fair even 5 years ago, but they have done a lot to raise their standards, I think. Or maybe they just have better authors now.

I still caution anyone not to use them exclusively, but the bad old days of misinformation that marked the MAA series are hopefully over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...