Dr. Zoidberg Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 No idea if that's proper terminology, I'm sure one of you can correct me Ahoy hoy, first post on this forum, long time lurker. Hans posted about same v. same scenarios in the "We're tired of WW2" thread. This was something I was thinking about before I had read his post, and obviously something I'd very much like to see in CMSF, so here is a thread dedicated to it! Hopefully this hasn't been brought up a zillion times already... Is it possible? Would it require too much work compared to the reward? What would that work be? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PseudoSimonds Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 You're in luck. Somewhere here in Winecape's Synopsis thread it mentions that it will be possible for blue vs. blue and red vs. red so you should be able to field two identical forces. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Zoidberg Posted December 1, 2006 Author Share Posted December 1, 2006 Sweet Zombie Jesus! Thank you, I missed that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 I've got to admit, pitting a similar force of T55s, infantry and BMPs against eachother is one of the MOST attractive aspects of this title! The experience of fighting with a modern Stryker Brigade will be totally worth the purchase price. And Blue on Blue battles (Bradleys vs Bradley?) could be a jolly hoot. But I expect its going to be Red on Red battles in every imaginable venue (1970s Egypt vs Lybia?) that could really give this title a long loooong shelf life. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.