Jump to content

Evacuating the royal family - ironic titbit


Recommended Posts

Guest Mike

I was reading a copy of "Aeroplane" magazine today & in it they had a little snippet about a Danish Fw-200 Condor that flew to the UK in 1940, and was going to be used to evacuate the Royal family should it come to that - since it was the only a/c in the country capable of lying hte Atlantic in one hop.

it briefly carried a civil registration G-AGAY before being taken over by the military as DX177, and was written off after an accident in 1941 left its undercarriage unrepairable.

Wiki has a brief mention of it in hte Fw-200 page, saying it was operated by BOAC.

the following mentions its possible civil operations, but nothign about any emergency use to evacuate TRH's.

attachment.php?s=145b0716626f6424c5f628f07e59c63a&attachmentid=29286

attachment.php?s=145b0716626f6424c5f628f07e59c63a&attachmentid=29285

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mike

sundeland had long endurance, but mainly 'cos it was slow - 1800-odd miles range. flying-boars were fuel hogs due to their unaerodynamic hulls.

Fw-200 has a 2200 mile range, 2800 miles in ferry config. the article mentioned that it's interior was stripped and canvas seats and extra fuel tanks installed, so the later sems more likely.

Being a landplane it had more flexibility in terms of where it could take off and land - you might think a flying boat has the whole ocean, but it requires relatively calm waters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Queenie, you might just get your feet wet.

Better that

Than being royally insulted

By a bad-seed Boy-King

All dressed up in faux

Cowboy clothes. :rolleyes:

Well,

Maybe better them - Dude duds

Than twirling about with a go

Mighty Ivy! - go!

Megaphone.

Some are ever intended,

It seems - to be a cheer-leader

Though,

Never... enny prime-time player. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mike
Originally posted by Lars:

Yeah, but who cares when you're on the run.

Sorry Queenie, you might just get your feet wet.

getting feet wet isn't a problem - getting the plane somewhere near the royals is the problem - where's the nearest spot of water suitable for a Sunderland to wherever they lived, viz where's the nearest aerodrome?

tehre are more land-aerodromes around London than suitable stretches of water for flying boats!

Aside from which you seem to have missed the point thathe Sunderland has the shorter range in hte first place....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Stalin's Organist:

where's the nearest spot of water suitable for a Sunderland to wherever they lived, viz where's the nearest aerodrome?[/QB]

Couldn't resist smile.gif .

sunderlandzj6.jpg

AllPosters.com

(Actually, for all I know they might have towed it there)

[ May 09, 2007, 03:23 PM: Message edited by: Bromley ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mike

Or taxied it under the bridge - the thing would never be able to get high enough pass the bridges in the available distance!! smile.gif

AFAIK all Sunderland bases were in the Shettlands, Wales, Ireland and Cornwall.

Having the Thames there means they could land and possibly take off, but doesn't make it an airbase capable of maintaining the aircraft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mike

You have to have it there ready.

You don't want the delay of finding that the nearest base doesn't have a Sunderland handy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...