Jump to content

How do you define "historical" scenarios?


Recommended Posts

I'm working (slowly) on two scenarios based on historical battles.

None of them can be reproduced accurately, since the units involved (India/DAK/Yugoslav partisans), terrain (desert/fortress/caves)and date (april'42/may'44) are out of the CM scope.

They're also too large to play well in CM straight off.

Therefore I'll have to improvise a lot, as well as bathtub the units.

Would you call these scenarios historical, semi-historical, pseudo-historical or fictional? And where do you put the limits between these notions?

Cheers

Olle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Pak. To me, it's not really an historical scenario unless it's almost an exact match of terrain and units with the real battle. So I'd call what you're doing "historically based" or something similar.

------------------

-Bullethead

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

A new issue:

- How do you define victory conditions for historical battles?

My typical way to define victory is based on the real battle. If the historical battle was fought with reasonable tactics and the outcome couldn't be blamed mostly on luck, then a game result close to the historic result will be a draw.

Any other opinions?

Cheers

Olle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...