Panzer76 Posted February 21, 2003 Share Posted February 21, 2003 Originally posted by Soddball: How do you get Pure Armour anyway? I can't find the controls at all. You gotta upgrade to 1.02. Then you'll find that option as with Combined Arms etc. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno Weiss Posted February 21, 2003 Share Posted February 21, 2003 What would happen if you upgraded to 1.02, and selected pure armor, but your opponent drops it into v1.01? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keke Posted February 21, 2003 Author Share Posted February 21, 2003 Originally posted by Panzer76: Yes, you killed alot of tanks, and Im sure you played well, but as Ive said before, there are quite a few CMBB players out there, so I dont think it is a record. Are there? I though that me and my opponent were the only ones playing this game. Originally posted by Panzer76: And anyhow, a record of what? To accuratly measure thses records, one would have to play on the same map with the same forces.The record of tanks killed per minute in 2000 pts Pure Armor PBEM ME with medium quality troops. Both sides bought their units (standard rarity) which should be, considering CMBB's purchase point system, rather balanced situation. Originally posted by Panzer76: Would it be a bigger "record" if I played on a pool table map with Tigers vs T-26? I would kill more vehicles than you did..It wouldn't be a rather balanced QB, would it? Originally posted by Panzer76: Would it be a bigger "record" if I played on a urban map with lotsa T34s vs Stugs and a very inexperienced player?This battle was on farmland, light tree coverage, and small hills. My opponent had whooped my a** before in QBs, and I consider him as a very respectable opponent. This time his tactics sucked, I admit. Originally posted by Panzer76: I hope you can see that there is no way one could quantify your "record". It is a amusing story and all that, but starting to talk about records is a bit silly. IMO. So the word "record" somehow touches your nerve, doesn't it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herr Kruger Posted February 21, 2003 Share Posted February 21, 2003 I think it is time to say : Nobody cares. It might be a record for those particular settings, it probably isn't. The bottom line is, it doesn't matter. Do ladder matches even track vehicle losses or casualties? They seem to track only wins/losses, which is a good idea. There doesn't seem to be any point to arguing whether this is a record or not, b/c it doesn't matter much. Why doesn't it matter? Well, your opponent could be your best buddy, he could have been intentionally trying something he knew to be reckless, etc etc... it's already been suggested, if you want accolades, join a ladder. Since this thread can go nowhere, it should be locked. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keke Posted February 21, 2003 Author Share Posted February 21, 2003 And what is your problem, Herr Kruger? All I wanted to do is share some information, but the very word "record" seems to just offend people around here, so my sincere apologies... That Tigrii fella was the only one who had some interesting info in his reply. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herr Kruger Posted February 21, 2003 Share Posted February 21, 2003 I don't have a problem. I'm just saying you should expect other players to look on this with some skepticism is all. No the word "record" does not bother me in the slightest. Why do you think the word "record" bothers me? Because I disagree with you? Because I think it may not be a record? I really don't understand why you think the word "record" bothers me, b/c it doesn't. You may have a record, you may not. You seem to have a problem with people thinking it is not a record, though. Like I said, it doesn't matter b/c people can make custom maps in which they can excel or play opponents whom they happen to outclass to set a new record, it is undoubtedly one of the reasons you don't see many posts like this one here. I'm sorry if you feel like you are being treated unfairly or rudely, I'm not trying to do that. I'm just saying, IMO, it doesn't really matter. And no, the word "record, does not bother me, for the record. Thanks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer76 Posted February 21, 2003 Share Posted February 21, 2003 Originally posted by Keke: Are there? I though that me and my opponent were the only ones playing this game. Oh, in the same way someone here could come and say, yes Keke, that is a record... Originally posted by Keke: The record of tanks killed per minute in 2000 pts Pure Armor PBEM ME with medium quality troops. Both sides bought their units (standard rarity) which should be, considering CMBB's purchase point system, rather balanced situation. .... It wouldn't be a rather balanced QB, would it? It would be according to your first expleantion. Thing is, players can choose wrong units. Like KT in heavy forested snow map. Originally posted by Keke: So the word "record" somehow touches your nerve, doesn't it? I just find it amusing that you want your game to be some sort of record. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keke Posted February 21, 2003 Author Share Posted February 21, 2003 Originally posted by Panzer76: I just find it amusing that you want your game to be some sort of record. I'm here to amuse people. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRUMLIN Posted February 21, 2003 Share Posted February 21, 2003 Keke has acheived a record alright, just not the one he was claiming... Grum 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keke Posted February 21, 2003 Author Share Posted February 21, 2003 Originally posted by Herr Kruger: I'm just saying, IMO, it doesn't really matter. And no, the word "record, does not bother me, for the record. For the record, I don't really care if it's any kind of record or not. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herr Kruger Posted February 21, 2003 Share Posted February 21, 2003 Originally posted by Keke: For the record, I don't really care if it's any kind of record or not. If that were true, you would not have posted this. Perhaps now you don't care, but at one point you probably did. J Kruger - officially done with this thread. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keke Posted February 21, 2003 Author Share Posted February 21, 2003 Originally posted by Herr Kruger: J Kruger - officially done with this thread. Thank you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manchildstein (ii) Posted February 21, 2003 Share Posted February 21, 2003 i think it's a record. here's another record... once i had 8 pzjg1s in a gulley... one turn i had them all 'shoot and scoot' to the 'lip' of the gulley with the plan that they would all reverse... you know.. 'scoot'... it took about 20 seconds for them to get into los/lof, then about another 20 seconds for 7 of them to die, then another 20 for the remaining one to 'scoot.' so losing 7 of 8 pzjg1s to a shoot and scoot within about 20 seconds of actual firing... it must be some kind of record... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.