offtaskagain Posted May 14, 2001 Share Posted May 14, 2001 Does anybody know if the MGs on tanks are modeled as the light MG42 or heavy? Yes, I know they really were MG34s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwolf Posted May 14, 2001 Share Posted May 14, 2001 For the 251/1, CMBO models it as twice as powerful as MG42 LMG, half as MG42 HMG. 34 or 42 isn't that important, the mount is, CMBO seems to assume the vehicle mount is between the bipod and tripod. Sounds right to me, but I am no MG expert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanir Ausf B Posted May 14, 2001 Share Posted May 14, 2001 <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by redwolf: For the 251/1, CMBO models it as twice as powerful as MG42 LMG, half as MG42 HMG. 34 or 42 isn't that important, the mount is, CMBO seems to assume the vehicle mount is between the bipod and tripod. Sounds right to me, but I am no MG expert.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Where did you find this information at? I've been trying to find the FP ratings for vehicle MGs for months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwolf Posted May 14, 2001 Share Posted May 14, 2001 <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Vanir Ausf B: Where did you find this information at? I've been trying to find the FP ratings for vehicle MGs for months.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Quick check: maximum range (in "target" command). Slower check: supression of infantry squad in foxhole (watch globale morale effects when testing all in one pass, tough) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts