John Kettler Posted December 30, 2021 Share Posted December 30, 2021 This is first rate OSINT combat analysis, and I feel it is highly relevant to CMSF2. It breaks down events year by year, discussing missiles used, total quantities involved (by type where known) and results, as well as where those ATGMs came from. There are some important tactical matters discussed as well.https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena/2018/05/04/seven-years-war-documenting-syrian-rebel-use-anti-tank-guided-missiles/ Regards, John Kettler 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lethaface Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Interesting. With regard to effectiveness of ATGMs in CMSF2 my anecdotal experience is that Metis-M and Kornet have a failure rate of about 30% in CMSF2 (nosediving). While the TOW-2A never nosedives. If this report is to believed the failure rate of Metis-M, Kornet (and probably AT-4/5/6) should be similar to the TOW-2A. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.