marka Posted December 23, 2013 Share Posted December 23, 2013 I noticed something odd about the defensive capabilities of the StuGIII in the encyclopedia: for side and rear facings, the rating for "Small calibre AT" is "BAD", which is WORSE than it is for "Large calibre AT" rounds, rated as "POOR". Also, for hollow charge weapons, frontal armor is weaker than side, rear, or top. Is this a misprint? Why would StuGIII armor be so unusual? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanir Ausf B Posted December 24, 2013 Share Posted December 24, 2013 It appears that the beta version of the game that was used for the vehicle screenshots in the manual had the "Bad" and "Poor" symbols switched around. It's that way for all the vehicles, not just the Stug. The ratings in the game are correct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.