Jump to content

StuGIII armor

Recommended Posts

I noticed something odd about the defensive capabilities of the StuGIII in the encyclopedia: for side and rear facings, the rating for "Small calibre AT" is "BAD", which is WORSE than it is for "Large calibre AT" rounds, rated as "POOR". Also, for hollow charge weapons, frontal armor is weaker than side, rear, or top. Is this a misprint? Why would StuGIII armor be so unusual?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...