Lt. Smash Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 I'm playing Road to Dimas (great campaign, btw, PaperTiger). I'm playing Hit and Run. I've played this scenario several times trying different tactics to see how to maximize the rebel's kills while minimizing their losses. No spoilers here, but... I have noticed that the foot-based AT-4A teams seem to be much more effective than taking out the T-72Ms than the AT-4C missile which is mounted on the BMP-1Ps that I'm given. They seem to be equally deadly (or not) but the 4Cs shot from the BMPs seem to miss a lot more than the 4As shot from the sand. Is this (a) my imagination, ( a fluke, or © due to the AT-4C being mounted on BMPs and less stable than the 4As which have a stable base to fire from? Bob 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boche Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 Your imagination ^^ in my experience its completely the oposite. I managed to take out every tank in the column using mostly the BMPs AT-4s. Guess as lots of things in the CM2 engine there are many ways things can happen. Good thing for diversity! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Posted February 10, 2012 Share Posted February 10, 2012 From what I've read the mount on top of the gun is not the most stable. But experience also tends to have a huge role in the effectiveness of Soviet ATGM's, so that's also worth checking. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.