Jump to content

TheDudeAbides421

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Upvote
    TheDudeAbides421 reacted to c3k in Free Copy AAR: c3k vs DMS. No DMS.   
    Okay, first things first.
     
    7,500 points? What was I thinking? That's not a lot. Not by a stretch. I was imagining a multi-company engagement with arty and air. All inside of 30 minutes. Sigh. I'm not a big QB player. And it shows. 7,500 points buys a single understrength company.
     
    My plan...I want to bombard DMS' setup zone, as allowed, in the second minute of the game. That's just to piss him off! Once he's off his equilibrium, it will be that much easier to topple him! Also, I need something to fight his Tunguskas. Of COURSE he's going to buy some. Wouldn't you?
     
    Also, I'll lay some smoke on his side of the bridge, so I can get my commander on it.
     
    Based on my self-imposed point austerity, all I can afford is a 4 piece 120mm mortar platoon. So, that's in.
     
    For combat power, I've got 2 Bradley (APS) mech platoons, but understrength. 2 tracks, 2 squads, each platoon.
     
    A third platoon is made up 3 elite APS Abrams. Hey! C'mon, it's MY AAR! These are the guys I'm counting on. Elite, highly motivated, +2. Even if their tank gets destroyed, I'm gonna ammo them up and send them in. They told me that's how they want it.
     
    A company HQ ties together the three platoons, adds an FO (to call in the mortars), and is mounted in an ERA Brad.
     
    Between the Abrams, the Brads' TOW missiles, and the Javelins, Ima gonna blow stuff up!!!
     
    Oh, I've added a little razzle dazzle. Since DMS will be looking for a Humvee, I added 3 more. Each stuffed with an elite .338 lapua sniper team. Yeah, these are the "snatch victory from the jaws of defeat" guys. If DMS manages to get his commander near the bridge, I'm going to have 3 sniper teams in overwatch waiting to perforate the bridge of his nose. Ouch. That metaphor hurt nearly as much as .338 Lapua does. The Humvees should confuse him. The snipers should screw him. Yeah, it's my "Screwed and confused" tactic. They teach this at Sandhurst. Or they should.
     
    Oh, I tossed Mk19 grenade launchers onto the top of the Humvees. Because otherwise they look naked.
     
    Pix in a bit.
     
     
    Ken out.
  2. Upvote
    TheDudeAbides421 reacted to tyrspawn in Infantry TAC AI - trying not to rant   
    One thing I found in the new black sea is that the US army troops in particular seem to be extremely prone to being pinned and cowering. One or two shots from an AK will send an entire rifle squad into laying down and being shot one by one, even when surrounded by AFVs and having good command lines etc.
     
    It's extremely unrealistic. US soldiers and marines would only devolve to such behavior under the most extreme conditions (continuous artillery suppression or continuous supression by a MG etc). It seems like the us army guys are pajamas to the worst extent in black sea.
     
    From a game design perspective:
    1. Group suppression needs to be replaced with individual suppression. This is made obvious when in "assault" during bounding overwatch. If the manuever elements gets suppressed the base of fire ellement will immediately start cowering. The whole job of the base of fire is to protect the manuever element and NOT lay down and give up. The guys manuevering are relying on the base.
    2. Combat spacing should be maintained.
    3. Reaction to contact drills would be nice. Taking fire from the front? Get out of your stupid file and get ON LINE and return FIRE
×
×
  • Create New...