Jump to content

melm

Members
  • Posts

    126
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by melm

  1. 13 minutes ago, chuckdyke said:

    Quoting the Soviet argument during the Cuba crises. If the US can point nuclear weapons to Cuba, Cuba can point our weapons to the US. Ukraine is a sovereign country and has the right to protect itself against Russia as it sees fit. 

    Yeah, I totally agree that any country has the right to deploy weapons they see fit. However, US didn't think so in Cuban Crisis and now Putin doesn't think so either. 

  2. 7 minutes ago, borg said:

    From BBC 

     

    Posted at 8:328:32

    France sending weapons to Ukraine

    Weapons and equipment are en route from France to Ukraine, as the West supplies aid to Ukraine in their battle with advancing Russian troops.

    President Zelensky tweeted that he had spoken to France's President Macron early on Saturday morning as a "new day on the diplomatic frontline began".

    "The anti-war coalition is working!" Mr Zelensky tweeted.

    On Saturday, Mr Macron posted a video of himself declaring: "The war will last - we must prepare for it!"

    It's good to see at least Ukraine is not totally abandoned to their own fate.

  3. 31 minutes ago, chuckdyke said:

    First for the Russian apologist. Russia is defending itself. Against whom, Ukraine? Ukraine joining NATO? Only a single NATO country has to say no. I suspect behind the scenes a few have told Putin they would Veto it. Vladimir has only one agenda and that is restoring the Soviet empire. 

    No one guarentees that Ukraine will never join NATO, and I still think it's the Ukraine's best choice to leave the Russian control. But Russia of course won't tolerate any offensive or defensive weapon deployed along its border, just like US didn't tolerate Soviet's missile in Cuba.

  4. 2 minutes ago, The_Capt said:

    Ok, let’s do China for a minute.  China’s not in the same league as Russia, I am not sure they are even playing the same sport.  China’s trajectory and activities mirror US early days as a rising power in the 19th century, they are in this to win.  Win what Capt?  Win the pen that gets to write the new set of rules.

    So What about Ukraine?  Well if you are trying for top dog, it does not mean you just have weight to throw around, you must also lead.  China has done this in its sphere but globally it has been standing back and waiting.  This whole thing is not helping China in my opinion.  They are playing a long game and a kinda-partner lit half the board on fire.  This is damned awkward for them as they are not ready to take over global leadership, they lack the clout or street cred and the US, while a little bruised up, is no where near ready to toss in the towel.  So now Russia starts a ruckus and they are trying desperately to not take a side while looking weak in the process; this does not promote a global leadership image and they cannot break with Russia the next biggest power in the “out club”.

    And then there is India..like what the hell guys?!

    China actually has no intention to write the new global rules. The fundamental intention is to keep ruling party ruling, just like what they did in the past two thousand years, with emperor, isolated, fed or revolt... Their cultue hasn't changed much.

    China indeed has no interest to condemn the Russian invasion because they played their abacus and found that they gained nothing besides moral high ground. Trade war is still going on. US still is blocking China's ambition to take Taiwan, which China thinks it legitimately hers. That's why China takes the stance refusing to condemn the invasion but repeatly concern the integrity of Ukrainian territory. 

  5. 4 hours ago, Bulletpoint said:

    Putin doesn't want world war 3. If he wanted that, he could just have pushed the button, or at least attacked the Baltics or Poland. He wants Ukraine because he thinks it's historically part of Russia, because he wants to leave a legacy, and because he's an intelligent sociopath who realises that Ukraine is an unguarded chess piece since they are not in NATO. I think that's all. Not digging a bunker just yet.

    Fully agree.

  6. 1 minute ago, Zveroboy1 said:

    Win or lose, they are likely to be treated as a pariah state by the international community for the next twenty years. And what's disturbing is that they probably took this into account and still went for it in the end.

    Russia is already a pariah state, isn't it? She has nothing to lose.

  7. 7 minutes ago, CHEqTRO said:

    Also, there is a chance that the attack on the Millerovo airbase was done by TB2 drones and not by Tochka-U missiles. If this is confirmed, the russian army REALLY needs to look into the capabilities of its air defence (Either that, or maybe the TB2 is just that good or/and the Ukranians really know how to make good use of them)

    TB2 is just a tactical UAV and the load is small. I doubt that they've been used to bomb the airbase. If they were used, the destruction it could inflict is minimal.

×
×
  • Create New...