Jump to content

PanzerMiller

Members
  • Posts

    212
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PanzerMiller

  1. Helicopters and UAS do not require LOS. Fixed-wing aircraft still require LOS (either direct or via UAV observation).

    Wow, the whole issue of integrating UAV observation with CAS will be really fun for us WWII-heads to learn! I'm looking forward to watching Bil show off some of these toys.

    I never was a fan of CMSF and, honestly, didn't expect to change my mind with Black Sea. But after following this DAR -- I'm definitely getting hooked!

  2. I'll get a better battle damage assessment on his infantry casualties as I walk through the engagement area.

    So you remain confident that 1st MRC will be able to (1) drive into the flank of and mop up Scott's remnant forces in the center of the map, AND (2) deploy those same units in the appropriate defensive posture to meet the approaching US forces?

    This will be very interesting to watch!

  3. It's obvious that the detractors in this thread are putting their political outlook/bias ahead of actual facts.

    Well...seems more accurate to say that some people here are putting their political outlook ahead of their spending patterns.

    Case in point: I will not buy a book written by (and thereby contribute money to) Bill O'Reilly. Period. If it's a great read that's filled with new insight on an interesting event in history, then it's my loss. I'll have to look elsewhere.

    This increasingly tangential thread will almost surely close soon...

  4. Fuser...I'm really sorry to hear about your cat's illness. I know how you feel.

    My father was a serious hard-ass ex-Marine who lived through Guadalcanal, Tarawa, Okinawa and the Chosin, and the only time I ever saw him cry was when he carried our terminally-ill dog out to the car to have her put down at the vet's office. I was about 10 years old, and I'll never forget it.

    Dealing with the death of a pet is really, really hard, no matter how old we are or how tough we think we are. Hang in there.

  5. I thought this image was too pretty not to share... the softer side of tank porn, my ISU-122s in position (hopefully acting as distractors):

    12510435894_9a579f7fb2_b.jpg

    Wow, that's an amazing shot -- the low profile of the ISU-122s, the complexity of the terrain, and especially the look of the breeze blowing the grasses from right to left...very, very cool.

    Now we have "Saplings" which are a ubiquitous sight in Belarus due to the forestry practices local to the area.

    Steve

    And it's this attention to detail that compels me to shell out a few dollars here and there to play CM games...Thanks Steve!

  6. Good stuff, sburke...I knew some tester out there would come through...

    Yeah, there are so many variables in this equation: terrain, unit type, unit condition, unit experience(?)...as with you, I don't expect an exact, quantitative relationship on hand during my gameplay -- but I would like some general sense of how I can expect my truppen to perform.

  7. HUNT means your guys are intensively looking for trouble, intensively seeking to minimize noise, intensively using cover, etc. If doing this stuff drained a unit as much as normal walking, don't you think all troops all the time would be using HUNT like behavior in real life? Yet they don't. Ponder that for a bit and get back to me :D

    I have indeed pondered...point taken, I guess :P

    Specifically, I was thinking of all this in a relative sense -- in terms of game mechanics, the "tiring times" for Slow, Hunt, Quick and Fast with Move as the reference. No, I haven't done my own tests -- but I'm hoping someone else has...!

  8. It is obvious why fast and quick commands result in tired troops. It is less clear to me why the hunt command has the same effect?

    I've been wondering the exact same thing for some time now...this doesn't really make sense to me. "Hunting" to me suggests movement that is slow and deliberate but not necessarily physically demanding.

×
×
  • Create New...