Jump to content

chiavarm

Members
  • Posts

    144
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chiavarm

  1. The report I read, which was later was found to be incorrect, was that the Polish Army had known the Germans used canvas covered cars to simulate tanks during maneuvers, Therefore the Polish Calvary charged these units thinking they were mere mocked up vehicles. I also read that captured soldiers punched the armor of the German tanks to see for themselves if it was the real think.

    Again, I later read that these reports were false.

  2. I am playing a scenario where there a frozen river going under a bridge. I want to take my infantry and using the bank of the river as cover, go under the bridge. It looks as though I won’t be able to go under the bridge. Am I interpreting this correctly? I have not reached the bridge yet, but it would be a dissapointment if I can not go under the bridge. :(

  3. Originally posted by zui:

    "if you have an HQ spot for the mortar"

    iam a newbie too. how i do it?

    If you HQ unit is in LOS of the taget and your mortar isn't, you will be able to target the enemy and get a yellow line.

    If your HQ and mortar don't have an LOS you will get a red line to the target and the mortar will not fire.

  4. Originally posted by Colonel_Deadmarsh:

    [QB]

    Wrong.

    It cannot be avoided. Tanks are being immobilized on open, dry ground.

    I believe an Immobilized vehicle is due to mechanical failure (breakdown / damaged) or an upgraded bogged condition.

    I also contend that using the fast movement mode increases the chance of mechanical failure.

    Therefore the chances are good that a vehicle will become immobilized.

    I wonder if the probability is the same for all vehicles, if relatively new models would be at increased risk, and/or it is model specific.

  5. This is my general consensus of the early German success:

    From my reading, while the Russians had a huge number of tanks many were outdated and the relatively few new models only a quarter of them were operational.

    The purges left commanders timid and unsure of themselves, so as not to under perform or over perform. Avoid a great loss. Do not become popular to draw the wrath of Stalin

    The factories were pressed to produce numbers of parts and quality suffered.

    During the First World War soldiers were fed up and just left the trenches and went home.

    During the Civil War, coercion was used on the communities to participate. Their Civil War was unlike that of the US, in that the combatants were willing to fight for the cause. In Russia they were apathetic. A common recruiting method was to ask for recruits. If none volunteered, Shoot someone! Ask again, if none Shoot ten! Repeat if necessary.

    The Bolsheviks, the ruling party, were not in power by popular public sentiment, but by force and slight of hand.

    I am sure the common soldier was weary of combat before hostilities broke out between Russia and Germany.

    The original placement of the Russian units allowed them to be gobbled up whole.

    The Germans on the other hand knocked out the Russian Air Force, so they had air superiority. While Germans had a numerical disadvantage of armor, they had experience and the ability to have the right number of tanks they needed at the right time.

    Hitler had every reason to be confident. His generals had painted bleak pictures in the past and the German forces came shined through.

    All this led to the early success of the Germans in Russia.

×
×
  • Create New...