Jump to content

Sanok

Members
  • Posts

    319
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sanok

  1. Originally posted by Denwad:

    sanok realize that if the russians have longer reaction times so will your troops

    I don't care about that. I just want the reaction times to be reasonable and realistic, not silly.

    I remember a game of CMBO I played several years ago when I first bought the game. I was defending in a QB. An assault HT and two regular HTs were advancing on my position. I had a light ATG fire at the assault HT. I zoomed in close to watch the destruction. I heard the sound of the ATG firing, but before the shell even struck, which it did, the other two HTs were already firing their MGs at my gun. That's simply ludicrous.

  2. Originally posted by Treeburst155:

    I just made a test scenario. One Regular Russian Rifle '42 squad with FP 125 is defending in tall pines, no foxhole, in command (no bonuses) vs one Regular German 41 squad (FP 124) in tall pines, in command (no bonuses).

    The German squad is split. FP for the half-squads are 62 and 49 for 111 total. This means the German squad lost 13 FP by splitting. I spaced the Germans 20 meters apart and advanced them. One split squad came under Russian fire and went to ground pinned, the other was unmolested. By the third turn, the Russian squad was broken (no casualties) and crawling away. One German halfsquad was cautious (2 casualties from initial contact). The other was in perfect shape, ready to pursue the broken Russian squad.

    One attacking squad shattered one stationary defending squad simply by splitting. Everything else was equal. Fire from multiple directions is powerful, especially when it cannot be suppressed due to game limitations. It was effectively 2 to 1 against the Russians, even though they had twice the firepower of each attacking halfsquad.

    Treeburst155 out.

    If the defending squad would have been attacked and flanked by two full squads, the defending squad would still only be able to fire at one of the attacking squads, yet, you would not have complained, because they were full squads. However, it's still gamey that the defender can't fire at nore than one target. I guess all attacks should now be done at one squad versus one squad. Anything else would be taking advantage of game limitations, and thus, be gamey.
  3. Originally posted by Shadow 1st Hussars:

    How far apart were the russains? How much cover did they have? Were they Regular or better?

    The three squads were all spread across the map. One was at the far left edge, one close to the middle, and the third not far from the second. All were in woods or tall pines. I don't know their quality.

    Even for upper quality troops, if they were, but I doubt, that's really quick reactions.

  4. I hope CMx2 deals with 'everything that can be spotted will be.' I also hope it deals with how quickly something is spotted. In a pbem I'm playing, I'm the defending Germans in a QB. I had an MG42 in a house unhide and begin firing for the first time in the game, which it did at one second into the action phase. At three seconds, it was taking fire from an enemy squad

    300 or so meters away. At six seconds, three squads were firing at it, none closer than 250 meters or so. Pretty amazing, that the Russians

    would hear an MG firing, freeze or drop down, look in the direction they heard the sound, see the tracers, locate the house, bring weapons to

    bear, and begin firing, all within 2-5 seconds. Darn! Those Russians are good.

    BFC, fix or do sumfink. smile.gif (I never thought I'd ever write that....)

  5. there is another use for attacking split-squads--Deception.You can make two platoons look like a company with support,possibly even more.

    I wanted to mention this as another advantage to splitting squads. With the way BB and AK do unit identification, you'll see infantry squad? and one man icon. As far as you know, it's a full squad. It's so infrequent that you ever reach the ID level to see two or three men icons in the squad, it's a big advantage to split them.

    I think BFC dropped the ball on this ID level. I've seen it so many times, that you only see one man icon, even in situations where you should obviously see three. I'll never forget the time I had two squads and an MG firing at an enemy full squad in open terrain, 150 meters away, day time and clear skies, but I only saw one man icon for two turns.

  6. Originally posted by Schrullenhaft:

    Did you 'uninstall' the previous driver before installing the latest driver ? If you haven't, then I'd suggest doing that (and rebooting before installing the driver). This should hopefully clear out any registry settings or other files that could somehow affect things.

    Did DirectX 9.0c install without problem ? You seemed to have mentioned that it wouldn't install properly before.

    I may have to test this out myself, though it may take me awhile to reconfigure an 845 system. One other difference is that the system I have will be running an older Celeron at 400MHz. This may be a critical difference and could prevent me from reproducing the same problem.

    What color depth are you running at on the desktop ? You may want to change it to something else (16-bit if you're running 32-bit or vice-versa). How different is your desktop resolution from the one that you're running CM at ? Would it be possible to make them the same (by deleting the CM prefs file) and see if the problem continues ?

    I didn't uninstall the old driver first. Won't that give me a blank screen without a driver?

    DirectX 9.0c installed without any problems.

    I'm running True Color 1024x768.

    Something that happened on this new computer that didn't happen on my old, was when I installed the games, I was given the choice of five different 800x600 screen resolutions. There was something that said 'with 100Mhz.' There were four different numbers I could choose. Does that make a difference?

  7. Originally posted by Sequoia:

    Spoiler !

    For those of you familiar with this scenario, I played a solo game as the Canadians and used the heavy artillery to pound the German infantry I ran into on my way to the pillboxes rather than, as the briefing suggested, using the arty on the pillboxes themselves. My plan worked but I wonder if this goes against the spirit of the scenario.

    Any opinions?

    It's war. You killed the enemy and took the objective. You probably saved a lot of lives on your side. You get an A+ in my book, especially if a relative of mine is in your company. smile.gif
  8. Before I got busy with Christmas, I previously posted:

    I just bought a new computer and installed AK and BB. Everything works fine, but an unusual problem has happened.

    If I minimize either game, then maximize it to play again, I get a black screen in any game, QB or scenario. I must use CTR ALT DEL to end the game. When I click on the desktop icon to start either game again, it's fine. The games only get the black screen if I minimize, then maximize.

    An additional problem has arisen since my original post. CMBO won't install. I click the install icon, but nothing happens.

    Several people responded, asking me questions. Here are the specs of my computer, an eMachines T2862:

    Microsoft® Windows® XP Home Edition

    Intel® Celeron® D 330 Processor

    Operates at 2.66 GHz

    256KB L2 cache & 533 MHz FSB

    Intel 845GV Chipset

    7.25"w x 14.125"h x 16"d

    60 GB HDD

    AOL 3 month membership included, click here for details

    8-in-1 Digital Media Manager (USB 2.0, Secure Digital (SD), Smart Media, Compact Flash, Memory Stick, Memory Stick PRO, Micro Drive, Multimedia Card)

    256 MB DDR (PC 2700)

    Expandable to 2 GB

    56K* ITU v.92 ready Fax/Modem

    Intel PRO 10/100 Mbps built-in Ethernet

    48x Max. CD-RW/DVD Combo Drive

    Standard Multimedia Keyboard, 2-Button Wheel Mouse, Amplified Stereo Speakers

    5 USB 2.0 ports (1 in Media Manager; 4 in back), 1 Serial, 1 Parallel, 2 PS/2, Audio-In & Out

    AC '97 Audio

    Intel® Extreme Graphics 3D

    64MB Shared Memory

    Thanks for the help.

  9. Originally posted by Elefant:

    I absolutely love CMBB, CMBO etc. and saw CMBB special edition for $20 tonight. Are the extra scenarios and the 200 mods worth it? Will their be conflict issues with CMMOS? Uh basically, will my cmbb experience be enhanced greatly with special ed, or should I stick to CMBB?

    I have the special edition. You can get the extra scenarios online. As far as modding, I do very little, so that disk wouldn't be worth it to me. I don't know which mods are on it, but I would think you could get many of them online, too. I recommend that you not get it.
  10. I just bought a new computer and installed AK and BB. Everything works fine, but an unusual problem has happened.

    If I minimize either game, then maximize it to play again, I get a black screen in any game, QB or scenario. I must use CTR ALT DEL to end the game. When I click on the desktop icon to start either game again, it's fine. The games only get the black screen if I minimize, then maximize.

    Is there a solution to this problem?

  11. Do you have a preferred course of action at the moment... i.e. is this an upgrade to a current box or a completely new system ? [/QB]
    The computer I currently have, is almost four years old. It's slow and can only be upgraded to 256 megs of RAM. My wife also uses it a lot for typiing projects she does for our church. I'd like to get my own computer, so we can both have our own machines and not get in each other's way.
  12. From what I've seen advertised, the Pentium 4 processor and 512 megs of RAM are pretty standard. I've seen that some machines have the i875 chipset. Is that any good? My old PC had the i810, so I got a better card. Ironically, it was the FX 5200. Still it was a big improvement over the i810.

    With a new machine, I shouldn't need to change the drivers, should I?

×
×
  • Create New...