Avatar

March 41: Situation looking bleak - Afrika Corps heading towards Cairo - Norway, Sweden under Axis boot - Allied navy loses 2 BB to 1 Italian BB - Malta destroyed (don't EVER leave your air there)

July 7th 40: - France fell last turn - Destroyed Italian BB at Bari - Luftwaffe making appearance in Sicily, but damaged air with naval bombardments - Holding Brest - RAF still over London

Turn 6: - French line holding - Ireland surrenders

Turn 4: - Destroyed Panzer SW of Brussels w/ canadian amphibious attack. - Denmark still holding out - Poland fell - Subs in NA down to nil strength - BB lost off of LC by sub attack

October 15, 1939: - Denmark under siege - Poland still holding out - Low Countries fell last turn - Ireland under attack by Allies - Submarines found by french cruiser and Canadian Corps

Anytime i'm on, I'm game. Not a newbie ICQ#:297132411

You don't need that many units to guard the coastline of Egypt/Suez, and isn't tying up a large part of the Luftwaffe a good thing in general? He'll take losses vs the RAF, he won't perhaps be inclined to invade as many neutrals, and he has a time crunch of Russia coming in. Is it really worth it for the Axis?

Assuming we have a successful axis victory in France by June/July '40, is there anyone else who believes that NA is the key to and allied victory? Zapp made mention to me that Egypt is too easily takeable, but I really disagree. Proper reinforcement with army+ 2-3 air should make Egypt untakeable. An axis failure to take this strategic city will inenvitable lead to an allied counter-attack once Russia is in the war. Italy is incapable of doing anything alone, and Germany is often too tied up to make a huge difference. If the Allies decide to reinforce Egypt, I understand that England may be understrength if Axis decide on Sealion, but that's where risk comes in. I try to reinforce egypt as soon as possible, and it usually works. Anyone else have some input?

I'd like to join, and win Sign me up. I don't have ICQ, but messenger. MSGR: true_avatar47@hotmail.com . Canada GMT (-5)

Come on, you lost control of the Atlantic, and then you think it's cheap that the Axis is not allowed to exploit it's victory? Half the reason, if not more, for winning the battle of the Atlantic as the Axis IS because it opens the possibility of an extended front, in this case benefiting Germany. First of all, you should NEVER lose the atlantic to subs. If he starts investing in his navy, you make sure you destroy it asap. Besides, the Allies have better forces and air screening on both sides of the Atlantic. The Axis player would really have to divert MPP's to sustain a war on the sea, and that's what you want. Less against Russia, right? I think invading Canada, US, is generally a waste of time and mpp's for the Axis. Transports can be spotted and sunk relatively easily by a patrolling RN and US fleet. As the Axis, it's a real gamble for me to even waste 1 corp to do such an action. HOWEVER, if I am winning (have won) the battle of the Atlantic, then I DEFINITELY would invade the USA prior to UK/Russia's fall. It's more or less your fault that he has this opportunity

Arator, dieses website ist fur die die english als muttersprache hat. wenn du deutsch schreibst, wir denken alle, "warum geht er nicht ins Panzerliga??" auch etwas lustig, dein name ist fast wie mein geschrieben... avatar-arator... komisch!

If anybody doesn't wish to play anymore, i'll gladly take their spot in this 1942 campaign tourney! My email is true_avatar47@hotmail.com

Sweet! Ok, I'll take your place, if admiinistration will allow it of course. Let know!! email is true_avatar47@hotmail.com p.s. if anybody would like a casual game, u may email me as well

Hello all. I'd be quite interested in taking part in this tournament. Is it still too late? I unfortunately only subscribe to Messenger. true_avatar47@hotmail.com I am EST (montreal)