Comrade Trapp
-
Posts
1,225 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Posts posted by Comrade Trapp
-
-
Originally posted by SokarSLO:
Hehe, the same to you m8
lol, jk. Found this pic the other day and been wanting to use it.
Merry Christmas all!
-
Would never happen! Our glorious President would fight'em off with pistol in hand.Originally posted by Qyusson:The only thing i really liked about it is the EU occupying Washington DC
-
"Merry Christmas"?!? The PC Police will not be amused......Originally posted by SeaMonkey:By the way "Merry Christmas" to all....and to all a good night.
"Happy Winter Solstice"!
-
How much you wanna bet this is gonna be another "one post wonder".
-
SC received PC Gamer's "Editor’s Choice” when it first came out, which was one of the primary reasons I bought it. Up until that point, I had never bought games over the internet, SC was the first.Originally posted by Kuniworth:Actually about the AI quality. GO read gamespot or any other big website and you'll see that the criticism against SC 1 was mainly about the AI. Gamespot ranked SC as great which could have been even better with a tougher AI.
-
Originally posted by jon_j_rambo:
I've never met an AI that was worth a dang (for a real game, not C-Trapp's Shutes & Ladders computer version).
I post my personal opinion on a subject that has nothing to do with you, only to have you throw cheap shots like that simply because you don’t agree with me.@C-Trapp --- Have you ever beaten the AI in SC?That’s real big of you Rambo.
The second quote you seem to post quite often (it seems anytime you disagree with me), which I find interesting because I've answered it for you repeatedly.
For now on, I would appreciate it if you no longer refer to me in your posts. nuff said.....
-
I also support SC2 having a strong AI, regardless of how long it takes.
-
Damn Tancred, for only 6 posts, you sure have made a lot of friends.
Keep up the good work!
-
Just bought CMBB at the age of 19, but have been a member here (mostly playing SC) since I was 16.
-
-
Your doing nothing wrong, warships can't be redeployed to the Suez Canal, only transports can.Originally posted by Matt0019:When I move a ship onto the red arrows in the S.Atlantic, the ships never redeploy to Suez. I have left them on the arrows for a year straight, on the same arrow, on different arrows, in a hex below the arrows. Nothing works. What am I doing wrong? :confused:
I use v1.07
Don't ask me why.
-
anyone?Originally posted by Comrade Trapp:Blashy
Are Russian partisans still active after the USSR surrenders?
-
Blashy
Are Russian partisans still active after the USSR surrenders?
-
Ok Rambo, how strong would you make the U.S. Atlantic Fleet?
-
With all due respect, I don't buy that. Even in the early stages of the game, it takes no more than a couple of turns for Germany to get the MPP's to build a tank group; in the latter stages, one turn is more than sufficient. Disabling the production queues leads to the "instant army" effect of SC, which wasn't in the least historical.Originally posted by rbensing:</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Blashy:
The Production queue is something that will have alot of debate over it. Me and Nax feel that having to save up MPPs for a unit is representative of a production queue and once you buy it and have to wait again makes it feel like you have two production queues.
And it's not good from a gaming standpoint, either. A good strategy game compels the player to make strategic choices. Disabling the production queue removes that compulsion. For example, if I'm Britain after the fall of France, and the PQ is disabled, I simply hoard my MPP's. If the German player does a Sealion, I build a bunch of corps. If he goes with a sub offensive, I build cruisers. If he goes with Barbarossa instead, I dump it into research and planes.
But if the PQ is enabled, hoarding doesn't do me any good, because I can't react instaneously. I've got to make some hard choices, with the knowledge that if I make the wrong ones, I'm screwed.
As you point out, the great thing about the game is that you can decide whether you want it on or off. But I think it's far more realistic, and a better game, with it on.
RB </font>
-
I agree.Originally posted by Lars:Seems a bit odd. The whole point of a fortress is you don't need an army to defend it.
-
Wow SeaMonkey, that was deep. Made me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
-
I believe someone said that last year as well.Originally posted by Micheal Wittman:"Awesome" I hope it comes out before Xmas holidays.!!!!!
-
?!?!? :eek:Originally posted by Moon:Yes, it is.
Martin
And it wasn't announced here?!?
You mean to tell me there is actually a target release date now?
-
I second the nomination of Hellraiser. He went from being a newbie to being in the "top 5" almost instantly, which isn‘t an easy thing to accomplish.
Comrade Trapp
-
My feelings exactly, nuff said.Originally posted by J P Wagner:Great post JJ but I do differ from your viewpoint in one regard...I have no sympathy for anyone who critiques the beta test system and those who participate...this forum for too long has had an hiearchal arrogance among those who consider themselves elite, because they won this tourney or that, and it is old.
Good luck to Bill, Dave and the rest, and will be looking forward to this release!
-
I wish.......Originally posted by jon_j_rambo:By the way, C-Trapp is testing?
-
Is someone jealous?Originally posted by jon_j_rambo:It amazes me why Hubert has the lower rung players testing this.
-
Farewell
in Strategic Command 2 Blitzkrieg and Weapons and Warfare
Posted