StoneAge
-
Posts
116 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by StoneAge
-
-
What I want
Iron Hand Rules
Multi player down to Platoon level
EFOW even on frendly forces
-
I agree with Sergei here.Another thing I suggest would be allowing exporting and importing AAR data for third-party campaign programs (or hand-written if the format is documented well enough). The program writes CM a file for creating a certain kind of battle, then after the battle CM exports a file that tells the program what happened and what losses were taken and so on. It would take some extra programming effort from BFC, yes, but less than if BFC had to design and implement a campaign system. At least it is more realistic to expect to happen, and it'd allow people to create as good or bad campaign system as they could.I dont think a campaign system from BFC will suit everybody. Just take a look at operations some like them but a lot don't.
If BFC gave us a forces data file that was imported into a game and then exported at the end of the game. That would give Campaigners at least a place to start.
-
Come on guys I want to know how bad I did.
-
"All done" sent you the scores the other day.
Thanks to all for a good competition and I will play better next time.
-
I hate 1.02 but I think we have to play with it as Juha Ahoniemi stated some of the players have already been burned by this bug.
I would have thought that no player in this tournament would be using a bug to there advantage.
so I think we will have to stay with 1.02
-
Yes that is what the manual states for this ROW3 but what about ROW4First, as the tournament manual states, only section winners go into the finals. Holien: it is not fair to compare the results of players in different sections against each other, since they have played against different people - comparisons are only fair inside each section. In fact, the output of the scoring system could be improved so that it would output each section separately; currently it only gives one single big list (which is a bit misleading, I agree).As I see the nabla system, you are scored against all 36 times a scenario is played. Not just the 3 times your group played it.
so why not wild cards for next three highest
ie
The_Capt 0.52
Heavy_Drop 0.42
Jon_L 0.41
They have a higher final score than 4 of the finalists
-
Seeing as this is my first time in the ROW what does this all mean.
Is it the top guy from each group (Lt Bull from mine)
or
The top x number
who advance to the next round
-
Who would like to join me as a group of three for the finals scenarios.
-
RHolland23 your email is bouncing me
-
How many people still have games outstanding.
I have one to finish with our sections replacement player.
just wondering if everybody is waiting on us.
StoneAge
-
keep going sounds like a great idea
-
Status Report ROW III, 3-2,
# The_Beast, StoneAge vs Steve_Fielding Completed
# Hosszupalyi, Lt_Bull vs StoneAge Completed
# King_Of_Debrecen, Major_Victory vs StoneAge Completed
# Rear_Guard_Action, SlicerW vs StoneAge Last 15 turns
# The_Christmas_Battle, StoneAge vs Legend42 Half way
-
Status Report ROW III, 3-2,
# The_Beast, StoneAge vs Steve_Fielding
Completed
# Hosszupalyi, Lt_Bull vs StoneAge
Completed
# King_Of_Debrecen, Major_Victory vs StoneAge
Completed
# Rear_Guard_Action, SlicerW vs StoneAge
Started Slow Progress
# The_Christmas_Battle, StoneAge vs Legend42
Started Slow Progress
**** ROW IV (part 4) ****
in Combat Mission: Afrika Korps
Posted
Where do we sign up for the next round.
i.e. all us non finalists