Jump to content

m45tion87

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

About m45tion87

  • Birthday 06/06/1987

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://None

Converted

  • Location
    Finland
  • Interests
    History and games...
  • Occupation
    Helsinki

m45tion87's Achievements

Junior Member

Junior Member (1/3)

0

Reputation

  1. I agree. Most game series are continuing with the same idea/interface/consept. And Paradox games are also buggy (which I completely undestand because the game is so complicated), but there must something good about them because I'm always looking forward to their games. Or am I too stupid to realise that I've been cheated?
  2. I dunno. I think Paradox makes a pretty good work with updates and patches... At least my opinion is that AI has improved more or less in every update they have made. Example AI doesn't make "suicide" landings so often as it used to be in orginal HoI. And I have understood that most of the players in their forums are quite satisfied with HoI and it's improvements. And community has also made many mods that also gives some extra challenge. And talking about talking about game interface and mechanism, I'm quite sure Paradox uses the same mechanics only because it's one of the reasons why their games are so popular. Why to chance a working consept? It could be worse! Again, I hope you understand what I'm saying.
  3. Uh... I've been playing HoI since it's release and encountered only few crashes (about 5 in year or so). Of course players complain about bugs and stuff, but IMO it's a great game generally (still playing it). New mods gives some fresh taste and community is helpful. I'm also single player veteran in SC and it's also one of the best strategy games I've played. I'm planning to save my money for both games (SC2 and HoI2), so I won't miss a great experience from either one. Hope I made myself clear
  4. To you Mannerheim: Do you have some relations in Finland or something? I just want to know, because I'm from Finland (that's why I usually have so much spelling errors).
  5. I'm still new here so I don't know everything...
  6. Also, there could be new technology that improve tanks and infrantry so they can move faster in winter... (Look suggestions on top)
  7. What changes there would be in SC2? I suggest that there would be: 1. More realistic winter condition (slower troops ect.?) 2. More useful partisan (There are good suggestions in Partisan topic) 3. Airborne troops(?) 4. You can choose only one country to play (IF you want) 5. There should be chat in IP games 6. Maybe bigger europe map (Whole Norway, Finland. And bigger Egypt and Russia. 7. British could have some extra troops to Egypt from commonwealth...(Throught Suez?) 8. More diplomatic war map(?) 9. Minor coyntries should have also joining percentage (but ofcourse you can still attack against them ) Put your suggestions too!
  8. If you can use partisans to take over your captured cities (Russia ect.) I must say that your opponent really can't be very experienced player... Or you are just lucky! There could be "supply convoys" that could be disrupt...
  9. Partisan could do something else than just move and try to attack against nearest enemy unit... I really don't why they won't do anything else like: - Destroy mines and oilfields - Disrupt MPP earnings - Sabotage airplanes (Well I don't know about this) Post your opinion... I hope I wrote that one right...
×
×
  • Create New...