Rouge

One aspect i liked in SC was the graphics. It added a real feel to the game. Lets hope SC2 is the same.

A division however isnt really sucnificant on this scale. 157 German divisons took part in barbarrossa (excuse the spelling). This scale is more on corps and armies. But maybe a forign volennteers corps would be good. There were belgian formations. The milice in France and the blue divison among others.

*Hic*

now the **** hits the fan

allies did lend land to each other.

sorta like those temporary ports in the french side of the channel?

IM IN!!! Dont forget australia though!

Well as crappy as you think the game is the fact stands, your speaking for the minority on this forum. I agree with you on your complaint, most people do but its one of the bugs in the game. You'd have a hard time finding a game without bugs.

As powerful as they are at the end of the day WHO won the war.....? Actually no one "wins" a war, there are always losses but in the primitive arithmitic of war it was us who had more lives to spend at the wars end.

Is there a downloadable demo?

if ppl can work around family commitments and if someone is willing to run it....

I like that idea! I made a post ageeeees ago about the weapons that armies are equiped with should have an effect on the opposing force. It was deemed 'Insucnificant on such a large scale"

I want to try this. Should i use the low countries corps in any way?

I was thinking(its probably been brought up before) that prehaps diplomacy could be fine tuned by adding the ability to sort of persuade countries to join you in alliance and to persuade countries to attack other countries. And the ability to ask for them to send troops to fight for the weherchmat It would have its down sides though im sure but what are your thoughts?

I agree, the german fleet is bottled up from the start-what about the commerce raiders?????