Jump to content

japinard

Members
  • Posts

    459
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by japinard

  1. Is someone making a mod for SC?

    Is this why this thread was started? Or is this discussion for the benefit of Hubert?

    Sorry if these are dumb questions.

    All the suggestions above are EXCELLENT.

    I have a suggestion that is totally different than all of yours: Nuclear Research.

    Exceptionally expensive and risky research program. When used it would eliminate all units and production for the hex hit.

  2. Originally posted by pzgndr:

    The Strategy Guide errata posted last September clarifies several things about HQ supply. Those ranges are tricky to understand. But if you want your units to get the maximum HQ supply possible, you need to watch those ranges.

    It often boils down to a tradeoff between a supply bonus versus the HQ command bonus. Do you keep your HQ forward to provide leadership for 5 key units, or do you keep it back closer to a supply source city to provide supply for everyone within range? That's the challenge players need to wrestle with.

    A technique for the German player to try in Russia is to use HQs in pairs. Have one HQ with high commander rating forward to provide leadership support. Have another HQ with lower commander rating back within range of a supply source city to provide logistical support. If it's within range of a 6+ city, that HQ has a supply value of 10. For a <6 city, the HQ's supply drops to 8 but this is still pretty good for central Russia.

    You just have to watch the partisan effects on city strength, which in turn affect the city supply range to the HQs. Being inside a city like Smolensk with only strength 1 will still give a HQ supply value 8, which will help everyone around Moscow more than having it up closer and out of supply. What good is leadership without supply? There's a tradeoff involved, and players have to decide what's best for them. ;)

    Can you please expand on this of me, Im sto;o; not comprehending.
  3. In case you missed it we're talkin about countries and their tendancies of Axis vs. Allies. Very good discussion. http://www.battlefront.com/cgi-bin/bbs/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=18&t=003340&p=2#000044

    However I'd like some infomration that states something like this (hisorically of course)

    Germany had thia many army units, air wings unit, Battlships, U-Boats etc.

    Netherlands had an Army Group I consisting of 2,000 troops.

    The USA had blah blah blah then ramping up production.

    I can use a database or refernece to really make this scenario come alive. Can somone point me in the right direction and give me some links?

    LIke army totals for all countries in 1939?

  4. JerseyJohn, excellent Reponse!

    A few questions though:

    The Baltic States were anti-semetic?! I just don't know how the governments could have assoaicated Jews with Russian Communism when Stalin kill just as many as Hitler did, and Stalin killed anyone else who looked the wrong way. I figured the Baltic States would be VERY anti-Soviet, and by 1939's russo-German non aggression act would be clamoring for help from Allied tpye nations who would oppose Stalin and Russia.

    Greece: Technically wasn't Greece "Allied" amd against the Axis since Germany invaded and conquered them?

    Rambo - Don't forget Stalin. HItelr's deeds are much more well documeneted and talked abou than Stalins... but Stalin was just as bad as Hitler, and maybe even worse.

×
×
  • Create New...