Jump to content

theBrit

Members
  • Posts

    316
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by theBrit

  1. One of the best games ever, great concept. I am hoping that TOW tops this series in everyway. Atmosphere, gameplay and replayability.
  2. "You can please some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the time."
  3. Personally you can't beat a human opponent, though I SP occasionally, I play against friends 90% of the time. MP has to be good for me so I am looking forward to hearing your notes and features with great interest. Thanks Matt
  4. We have to remember that BF Im sure, if they had TOW from the start would have had it in....but they inherited it! Perhaps the expansion or TOW2 (if it sells well)
  5. Its academic now anyway its not in, but for the purpose of town/village ambushes having antitank and snipers in buildings would be a great advantage.
  6. I must admit the 'no entering buildings' is a taint on a otherwise great concept.
  7. I thought I'd post this here to keep the update thread clear. Good find!
  8. It was bound to happen, whilst checking out your excellent selection of new screens I noted some elements that I need to clarify. Firstly I note that you as the player can view from the enemies perspective, is this an option and can it be toggled on/off for realism? Secondly I note that the Enfield has an 'aimed' range of 2560 metres, surely that’s not effective range or maximum range as the ranges for both are: Effective: 900m Maximum: 2000m ? Your Mills bombs (grenades) also have a similar odd range of 40 metres, this too seems excessive? I only have checked my Nations stats, I wonder if anyone else has noted oddities?
  9. The best News I've heard all month.... Well done to all involved, I wish you all the success with this project. I can only do my bit and buy it as soon as its released.
  10. When you say 40 maps, are all 40 useable in MP?
  11. If you add horses, then some may argue for bicycles too!!! (though I agree, horses played a major part in logistics during WW2)
  12. Ok Kecks your concerns might have been valid but you attitude is not welcome here. I am sure BF would have answered yours (and now my) concerns but your childish attitude and poor arguement has lost you respect. Calm down and rethink your post, and be more constructive....if possible!
  13. My new system's got a 8800 GTX card, awful news!
  14. Armour distribution should be based on the historical scenario as opposed to purely pleasing the tank buff. So good news!
  15. Hmmmm a rather negative post, but you do seem to have valid concerns!!!! Only three tanks in MP, only 7 maps etc etc. These things are not known to me and are alarming. [ February 04, 2007, 04:26 AM: Message edited by: theBrit ]
  16. Nice, very nice...... So good infact its bookmarked for regular reading. Thanks
  17. Ok people enough sucking up.... MORE UPDATES!!!!!
  18. How stable is the Multiplayer aspect of the game and does it need improving Unsobill
  19. very interesting, many thanks.... (I will say this though, I would expect all of the above as a given)
  20. I think thats way off in the future, as this engine purely concentrates on squad level tactics and battles. Nice idea though! Imagine having Division, Brigade and Platoon level MP interaction.
×
×
  • Create New...