TheCrow

This is a ABSOLUTELY bug, cause of the a/t are ABSOLUTELY invulnerable to direct fire and they can destroy your troops one by one... armor piercing round has flat trajectory but high explosive no at all. This bug could became a nightmare in PBEM games as gamey tactic. Of course defilade A/t guns has a very good cover , but they are not invulnerable to direct fire. My experiences in last pacth. it´s uber A/T guns can stand impervious to dozens HE rounds.

the AT guns invunerablety in defilade, is the worst bug I´ve ever seen en CM. Please, Battlefront "fix or do somefink" as soon as posible. New pacth are useless.

One thing, that you had not thought. It´s that in real combat your subordinates has better "AI" than your computer. When you command your troops, in a tactical computer wargame, it´s better than you has a direct control of them, in order to simulate your officers command. Of course this give you a unreal "God" vision, but the profit of this direct control is by far more advantageous in gaming terms. .I think than the unit´s system control in CMBB is good enough. ¡¡¡It´s real good one!!!

I´ve read that mgs and light artillery are "real killers" in CMBB. How defend your infantry, of those improved weapons?: Put them in SPW,if it is posible. Of course, beware of AT defenses.

I don´t have CMBB yet, but I think that armored infantry will be more useful in CMBB, than CMBO. is it true? can you explain me some experiencies? Thank´s

Fallschirmjägers squad in CM carry 98 Kar. I thought than they were equipped with semiatomatic rifle (Gewehr-m43). Someone could tell me something about this.

King Tiger seems to me too vulnerable to bazooka side shots. Correspond it to reality o is it a favour to american side?

Sometimes it seems to me that tank crew losses in KNOCKED OUT vehicles are benevolent. Is it true? Which of these penetration hits has more destructive effects AP or HW? (in real tank warfare).