Jump to content

Erwin

Members
  • Posts

    17,458
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by Erwin

  1. Luke, personally, I really don't care one way or the other re insignia. All I questioned was the "realism" (since that is what most people like about CM2) of bright colorful, easy to see insignia on uniforms.

    Why that question became so controversial is just weird. It's a question of "The Emperor's New Clothes" and the photographic evidence is clear and overwhelming.

  2. Can someone translate? I couldn't figure out what a Russian journalist was doing there. Fixed cameras on AFV's? (Great idea btw, why don't our allied forces have that?) And what on earth are they shooting at. I wondered if it was some training town in Russia(??) Didin't see any ID on any AFV's - like the little syrian flags they have in the CMSF game.

    Truly amazing footage. But, hard to figure out what is going on. When one of the tanks is hit - not sure if it has a camera - it seems to just sit there taking hits for ages before moving away. And the dust clouds every time a tank fires... seems to gve cover for inf to walk up and plant a bomb on a tank. There could be thousands of troops in those bombed out buildings. What can the tanks do about it?

    Great war footage and an eye-opener re urban combat with armor. Seems futile...

  3. "...the Katyn massacre was just need to kill Polish officers that they are not moved to the side of the Germans..."

    "...reason to kill them is the Soviets wanted control of Poland as a buffer..."

    Both Germany and Russia had Poland as a longstanding enemy through the centuries, and both wanted to destroy Poland as a nation-state once and for all, turning into a vassel state of uneducated untermensch worker slaves... Rather what Germany planned to do with the entire Soviet Union as well. In terms of keeping it as a buffer, the Brest Litovsk agreement between Gernany and the SU divided up Poland so there was no buffer at all. Katyn happened after that.

  4. You missed my point entirely. In many of those LONG static takes in the "incredible footage" clip the camera never moves, and you can tell from the foreshortening in the images that the camera is using a very long focal length lens.

    It makes sense that the camera is a) far from the action so even when the tank gun aims at the camera, the gunner doesn't appear to see it, and B) the camera(man) doesn't move or duck to safety (cos it's on a fixed tripod and he is sensibly controlling it remotely).

    If one was planning this sort of shot, that's the way to do it safely. (Yes, I used to be in the movie biz.)

    Obviously. there are also handheld shots taken from a high angle very close and right above the tanks that are way more dangerous to shoot.

    I wonder if the tanks can't elevate their guns enuff to shoot up there. Same issue the Soviets had in Afghanistan... until they brought in AA and Shilkas.

  5. Hope you remmebered to give them a facing order towards the tank if there is a waypoint there.

    I have had success several times (accidentally discovered) by simply having a team FAST move from building A to B (no intermediate waypoints), during which they happened to see a tank, stopped their sprint, aimed, fired and killed the tank, and then continued to B.

    Probably doesn't happen all the time. But, the tactic seems to work at least part or most of the time.

×
×
  • Create New...