Jump to content

offtaskagain

Members
  • Posts

    1,134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by offtaskagain

  1. The Russians appeared to like the Valentine. Dmitry Loza in his memoirs on www.battlefield.ru said

    After 1943 we largely declined British tanks because they had significant deficiencies. In particular, they had 12-14 h.p. per ton of weight at a time when good tanks had 18-20 h.p. per ton. Of these three British tanks, the best was the Valentine produced in Canada. Its armor was streamlined but more importantly, it featured a long-barreled 57mm main gun.
    Edit: He also said this about the Matilda.

    In general, the Matilda was an unbelievably worthless tank!

    [ February 24, 2003, 05:21 PM: Message edited by: panzerwerfer42 ]

  2. I've only seen one reference to russian cannister at all.

    . Out of thirty cases of ammunition, only two were with subcaliber shells, eight - armor piercing, and the rest - fragmentation/high explosive grenades. There was also a certain quantity of grape-shot, for self-defense against infanty, which gave us a feeling of confidence, but, fortunately, I never had to fire it. (For those unfamiliar with artillery I have to explain that, if a medium machine gun, when beating back an attack, fires practically around 250 rounds per minute, a single gun, firing grape-shot, can create a density 25-50 times greater, and a four gun battery - 100-200 times; moreover, the bullets spread evenly across the front, not leaving any dead ground. Attacking such battery is a hopeless proposition.)
    This is from the memoirs of Evgenii Monyushko on the Russian battlefield site.
×
×
  • Create New...