Jump to content

jwxspoon

Members
  • Posts

    578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jwxspoon

  1. US Army 1983 to 1991

    1983-1986 Forward Observer assigned to A company, 2/75th Rangers, Ft. Lewis, Washington

    1986-1987 Fire Support Sergeant for A company, 1-325 Parachute Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne, Ft. Bragg, North Carolina.

    1987-1991 Special Forces School and then an SF 18E (A team commo sgt) assigned to ODA-752, 2nd Battalion, 7th SF Group, Ft. Bragg, North Carolina.

    jw

  2. This is what I like to refer to as a "Can o Worms" thread...

    Not sure if I am the guy Mike was referring to on the CMAK beta team (I suspect he means another gent I am thinking of) but both Rune and I have in fact stopped posting our scenarios at the Depot until there is a change made to a new system, for a variety of reasons.

    First, I get much better feedback on my scenarios via email than I do in reviews at the Depot with the current system. Also, I have access to a dedicated group of testers that are varied enough in their opinions to help provide me good feedback.

    Second, (I won't rehash the contents of other threads here) it is difficult to get a consistent numerical rating with the current review system.

    Third, brain-dead and pompous idiot reviewers gave me a bad taste on the whole process. Every designer has a jerk or two they will think of when they read this paragraph. I won't even get started here on that guy. :rolleyes:

    I know talented designers that quite literally stopped producing scenarios after dealing with a few of these types of folks. My and Rune's response was simply say 'screw this' and make the scenarios we like without exposing them to the current review system at the Depot. :mad:

    Once things switch over to the new system I will probably participate fully. I WILL donate to the upkeep of the Depot if Admiral Keith posts a paypal link, and I will buy that gentleman a beer when I finally get to meet him. It is because of people like the Admiral, or the other designers - people that put hours of unpaid effort into creating scenarios or websites that can be enjoyed freely by all - that the CM series has become successful even beyond the merits of the individual games.

    jw

  3. Hey guys!

    Sorry it took me so long to notice this thread, I generally run away from Michael Dorosh authored threads as fast as I can :eek: (just kidding Mike! Actually after seeing pics of your jeep I am working hard to get mine up to snuff)

    Rune and I were talking the other day about what changes we would like to see in the rating system at the Scenario Depot. Both of us wholeheartedly support Admiral Keith and the Scenario Depot. It has become the best online repository of scenarios for the CM series. However, the current numbering system does need to be changed.

    I would like to see a switch from a numbering system to a simple poll-type display. A reviewer would simply pick from the following choices:

    1. Highly Recommended

    2. Somewhat Recommended

    3. Reviewer is Neutral

    4. Somewhat Negative

    5. Extremely Negative

    The results could be displayed in a percentage type basis. Perhaps there could still be a section for individual text comments by the reviewers, as well as a rebuttal section for the scenario author.

    jw

  4. I have an Alienware Area 51M laptop which I purchased in November of last year. It is a P4 2.8ghz with 512MB Ram and a Radeon 9000M graphics card with 64MB of video ram.

    It plays any CMBB and CMAK scenarios I have thrown at it, even some of the latest Rune monstrosities, as well as my XP2500+ desktop does. I would highly recommend the ATI Radeon mobility series video cards.

    jw

×
×
  • Create New...