Jump to content

Firefly

Members
  • Posts

    1,142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Firefly

  1. Yes, that's right, early war British doctrine divided tanks into cruisers (the A series) and infantry tanks (Matildas, Valentines and Churchills). The cruisers were supposed to engage enemy armour and were deemed to require speed and at first weren't equiped with HE rounds, whereas the infantry tanks only needed to keep up with the PBI, so speed wasn't important. The British employed Lees (Grants), Honeys (Stuarts) and Shermans as cruisers.

    One person who didn't underestimate the Lees was Rommel, who described the first encounter with them as 'an unpleasant surprise'.

  2. As I understand it, there will be a European version published by CDV, available in shops, but this time there will be no ban on Europeans ordering direct from BFC or US shops importing the CDV version. I'm sure Moon will put me right if I've got it wrong smile.gif .

    [ October 11, 2003, 05:39 AM: Message edited by: Firefly ]

  3. Originally posted by Dandelion:

    Sort of like a fellow seeing this fantastic woman in a bar, but, seeing as she's well educated and full of confidence, he realises the amount of work it would take to even catch her attention and indignantly opts for the drunken halftroll with no self esteem in the corner instead.

    Leave my private life out of this :D .
  4. Originally posted by Jim Boggs:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Firefly:

    If you don't count Commando comics and Captain Hurricane (who dealt with Tigers by ripping the commanders hatch off the hinges and giving the evil Nazi TC a good old British sock on the jaw), probably around 1965-66.

    Are you by any chance referring to Sgt Fury and His Howling Commandos?

    </font>

  5. It's certainly a bad week for the BFC forums, first we lose the unnamed one and now I find that william amos is leaving for similar reasons. Mark my words, future historians will look back on this week as the start of the end times.

    BTW Seanachai, did you get that set-up I sent? We'd better get a move on, what with the Apocalypse being just around the corner and all. Unless you're hoping that the Four Horsemen will take pity and stay their hand until we're finished.

    [ October 07, 2003, 01:03 AM: Message edited by: Firefly ]

  6. Originally posted by John D Salt:

    I don't think you should believe everything you hear from Kafka, or Sassoon. ;)

    Well Kafka and Sassoon, along with Owen, Graves and Remarque, accurately reflected the feelings of the troops at the front toward their senior commanders. Keegan in The Mask of Command argues that the Chateau General mentality was a least a contributory factor to the mutinies that all armies (apart from the US) in the war suffered from and makes the point that many of the senior commanders of WW2, themselves junior officers in WW1, actively rejected it. 'No more Sommes' was virtually a mantra in the British senior command in WW2. Carlo D'Este tells the story of how an American officer, involved in the planning of D-Day and exasperated by what he saw as British intransigence was told by a British colleague 'It's not just British intransigence you're up against, it's also the ghosts of the Somme' (quoted from memory, so probably not word perfect).
×
×
  • Create New...